2008
DOI: 10.1039/b711165g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis by microchip capillary electrophoresis – current limitations and problem-solving strategies

Abstract: Obstacles and possible solutions for the application of microchip capillary electrophoresis in quantitative analysis are described and critically discussed. Differences between the phenomena occurring during conventional capillary electrophoresis and microchip-based capillary electrophoresis are pointed out, with particular focus on electrolysis, bubble formation, clogging, surface interactions, injection and aspects related to the power supply. Current drawbacks are specified and improvements for successful q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EOF originates from diffused counter-ions within electrical double layer (EDL) that drift under a tangentially applied field and drag along the liquid layers in a nearly uniform plug flow. Nevertheless, EOF rates are sensitive to surface properties, which may undesirably vary with the pH of the background solution as well as with irreversible adsorption of the charged analytes [16,17]. Thus, EOF can be accurately and rapidly switched by simply modulating the field.…”
Section: General Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EOF originates from diffused counter-ions within electrical double layer (EDL) that drift under a tangentially applied field and drag along the liquid layers in a nearly uniform plug flow. Nevertheless, EOF rates are sensitive to surface properties, which may undesirably vary with the pH of the background solution as well as with irreversible adsorption of the charged analytes [16,17]. Thus, EOF can be accurately and rapidly switched by simply modulating the field.…”
Section: General Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transference of the adopted buffer from conventional to microchip format gave a poor resolution, mainly due to the short effective length of the microchip compared to conventional capillary, and another buffer, prepared with cyclodentrins HP-b-CD and CTAB, was needed to achieve suitable separation. Finally, an important review dealing with quantitative analysis using CE microchips indicates the analytical potency of these miniaturized devices [133]. Other relevant examples are, among others: the ultrafast detection and simultaneous analysis of genetically modified maize [127]; the analysis of neuroactive amines in fermented beverages using a portable and versatile microfabricated CE microchip system, which has been used in the identification of biomarkers such as amino acids, amines, amino sugars and nucleobases in other fields [128]; artificial dyes [129,130]; and toxic alkaloids (colchicines, aconitine, strychnine and nicotine) [131,132].…”
Section: Food Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the trend towards increasing utilization of microfluidic chips in analytical chemistry, confirmed by the steadily growing number of scientific publications focusing on microfluidic chips (Fig. 1), chip-CE has to overcome significant challenges in comparison with classical capillary-based CE, especially in regard to its relative complexity and a number of technical hurdles, ruggedness, reliability and ease of operation [49].…”
Section: Conventional Capillary-based Ce Versus Ce-on-a-chipmentioning
confidence: 99%