1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03113.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of electron energy‐loss spectra from ultrathin‐sectioned biological material

Abstract: SUMMARY A computer program for quantitative spectral analysis is proposed for the elemental analysis of biological material by electron energy‐loss spectroscopy in a conventional transmission electron microscope, the Zeiss EM902. Bio‐standards are used to test the performance of this program. The application of a simplex optimization method for curve‐fitting is proposed to separate the ionization edge from the background. Making use of Ce‐, Ca‐ and Fe‐bio‐standards, this method is compared with Egerton's well‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In biological samples, the calcium spectrum is superimposed on a rapidly falling background of random energy loss, and artifacts may result from scattering effects. The background is therefore subtracted from the experimental spectrum by computer-assisted processing (Ahn and Krivanek 1983;Sorber et al 1991;Reimer et al 1992) to obtain the net calcium-specific spectrum. The methods used for EELS and ESI acquisitions and background calculation have been described previously (Bordat et al 1998).…”
Section: Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In biological samples, the calcium spectrum is superimposed on a rapidly falling background of random energy loss, and artifacts may result from scattering effects. The background is therefore subtracted from the experimental spectrum by computer-assisted processing (Ahn and Krivanek 1983;Sorber et al 1991;Reimer et al 1992) to obtain the net calcium-specific spectrum. The methods used for EELS and ESI acquisitions and background calculation have been described previously (Bordat et al 1998).…”
Section: Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For energy losses above 100 eV, the background was assumed to follow an inverse power law I(E)=AE r , where I(E) is the intensity at energy loss E (De Buijn et al 1993). The pre-edge window (12-16 eV) used to calculate A and r by the Simplex optimization (Sorber et al 1991) for each spectrum was determined experimentally, and the calculated background was subtracted from the experimental spectrum. The relative section thickness t/l [t/ l=ln(I t /I o )], where l is a function of the specimen composition, was evaluated by the magnitude of the zero-loss peak I o (adjusted to 10 7 relative intensity) with respect to the intensity I t =0-100 eV (Reimer et al 1992).…”
Section: Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net iron spectrum was obtained by subtracting the background. This is composed of random energy losses and was calculated by simplex optimization (18).…”
Section: Eelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of a three dimensional Simplex method (see Fig. 7) allowed us to judge the minimal number of channels in the r-range that was needed to get constant values for A, and r (for Caand Fe-Bio-standards see [7,8] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th acquire good-quality reproducible spectra, we recently advocated the use of ultrathin sectioned Bio-standard [6][7][8] figure 6c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%