2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of Li by PIGE technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross sections for the nuclear reaction 7 Li(p,p’γ) 7 Li (Eγ = 478 keV) in the proton energy range between 2.0 and 4.2 MeV were also investigated for improved Li quantification in ‘thick’ samples by PIGE (Fonseca et al . ). Experimental γ‐ray yields for Li inorganic (muscovite and holmquistite) and organic compounds were measured and compared with calculated yields.…”
Section: Advances In Accelerator‐based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cross sections for the nuclear reaction 7 Li(p,p’γ) 7 Li (Eγ = 478 keV) in the proton energy range between 2.0 and 4.2 MeV were also investigated for improved Li quantification in ‘thick’ samples by PIGE (Fonseca et al . ). Experimental γ‐ray yields for Li inorganic (muscovite and holmquistite) and organic compounds were measured and compared with calculated yields.…”
Section: Advances In Accelerator‐based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The best detection limit for Li (0.8 lg g -1 ) was achieved using the 7 Li(p,a) 4 He nuclear reaction using a proton energy of 635 keV, detecting both a particles in coincidence for a high signal-to-noise ratio and taking advantage of recent improvements such as the double-sided silicon strip detector, already reported in Wiedenbeck et al (2014). Cross sections for the nuclear reaction 7 Li(p,p'c) 7 Li (Ec = 478 keV) in the proton energy range between 2.0 and 4.2 MeV were also investigated for improved Li quantification in 'thick' samples by PIGE (Fonseca et al 2017). Experimental c-ray yields for Li inorganic (muscovite and holmquistite) and organic compounds were measured and compared with calculated yields.…”
Section: Examples Demonstrating the Capabilities Of Iba Techniques Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los principales factores que influyen en una identificación elemental son: la intensidad de la energía del haz, la sección transversal de la reacción nuclear, la energía de Coloumb, el número y la distribución de átomos en la muestra, además del tiempo de exposición de la misma (Mateus, 2017).…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…As most of the excitation functions of the pertinent gamma-producing nuclear reactions do not depend smoothly on proton energy, but exhibit narrow and large resonances, till recently most of the PIGE analytical work was done with resource to standards. This method may lead to large uncertainties if the standard is not similar to the sample to be analysed [1,2,3,4]. Since the last few years an effort has been made to develop a standard free method based on calculating codes as ERYA [5,6] which integrate the excitation functions in order to obtain the corresponding gamma-ray yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%