Bioreaction Engineering 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59735-0_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Analysis of Metabolic and Signaling Pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… All these compounds, except for nuclear DNA, trehalose and glycogen, were assumed to maintain constant ratios among themselves during the whole cell cycle. Intracellular concentrations were calculated for each phase on the basis of concentration data for cell number and biomass dry weight in combination with mean cell volumes for the respective cell cycle phase (Mauch et al , 2000; Müller, 2006). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… All these compounds, except for nuclear DNA, trehalose and glycogen, were assumed to maintain constant ratios among themselves during the whole cell cycle. Intracellular concentrations were calculated for each phase on the basis of concentration data for cell number and biomass dry weight in combination with mean cell volumes for the respective cell cycle phase (Mauch et al , 2000; Müller, 2006). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Or, can we simply sum up every enzyme reaction to understand the system quantitatively?). By comparison of in vitro, in situ, and in vivo results for enzyme kinetics of the phosphofructokinase I system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, it has been demonstrated that remarkable dierences in structure of the kinetic expressions, as well as in parameter values, can be observed in the case of such complex enzyme systems (Mauch et al, 2000). Consequently, we recommend using the measurements of intracellular metabolites for identi®cation of in vivo enzyme kinetics in a similar way as measurements are applied to identi®cation of in vitro kinetics within test tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As shown, sudden changes of glucose availability caused intracellular metabolism dynamics, which has been the basis for identifying in vivo enzyme kinetics by a sequential procedure of glucose pulsing, rapid cell sampling, metabolism inactivation, intracellular metabolite analysis, and detailed modeling using structured, mechanistic models. In the following, similar (experimental) studies have been performed analyzing S. cerevisiae (Vaseghi et al, 1999; Mauch et al, 2000; Lange et al, 2001, Ostergaard et al, 2001), Zymomonas mobilis (Weuster‐Botz and de Graaf, 1996; Weuster‐Botz D., 1997;) and Escherichia coli (Schäfer et al, 1999; Sauter et al, 2002; Chassagnole et al, 2002; Hurlebaus et al, 2002; Degenring et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%