2020
DOI: 10.1242/bio.055228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of subcellular distributions with an open-source, object-based tool

Abstract: The subcellular localization of objects, such as organelles, proteins, or other molecules, instructs cellular form and function. Understanding the underlying spatial relationships between objects through colocalization analysis of microscopy images is a fundamental approach used to inform biological mechanisms. We generated an automated and customizable computational tool, the SubcellularDistribution pipeline, to facilitate object-based image analysis from 3D fluorescence microcopy images. To test the utility … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected 10 and 4 µm as the upper boundary for the pseudocell radius for NC 10 and NC 13, respectively, based on measuring the centrosome-to-centrosome distances from a set of representative images. A detailed protocol for RNA analysis was recently described ( Ryder and Lerit, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected 10 and 4 µm as the upper boundary for the pseudocell radius for NC 10 and NC 13, respectively, based on measuring the centrosome-to-centrosome distances from a set of representative images. A detailed protocol for RNA analysis was recently described ( Ryder and Lerit, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively compare the distributions of plp versus gapdh mRNAs, we measured the percent of mRNA residing within 1 μm from the centrosome surface using a custom Python package (Ryder et al, 2020; Ryder and Lerit, 2020). From this analysis, we observed significantly more plp mRNA localized to centrosomes relative to gapdh mRNA (2∼3-fold more plp mRNA than gapdh mRNA at interphase versus 1.5∼2-fold more at metaphase centrosomes; Figure 1C, Table S1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stellaris plp and gapdh smFISH probes conjugated to Quasar 570 dye (LGC Biosearch Technologies; Middlesex, UK) were designed against the coding region for each gene using the Stellaris RNA FISH probe designer (Ryder et al, 2020; Ryder and Lerit, 2020). smFISH probes were dissolved in nuclease-free water at 25 μM and stored at -20°C before use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations