1983
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.67.5.1129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative analysis of the high-frequency components of the terminal portion of the body surface QRS in normal subjects and in patients with ventricular tachycardia.

Abstract: SUMMARY Quantitative analysis of the high-frequency components of the terminal portion of the surface QRS was performed in 42 normal subjects (group 1, ages 18-67 years, mean + SEM 34.7 + 2.2 years) and in 12 patients with symptomatic, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (group 2, ages 48-76 years, mean 59 + 2.3 years). Signal averaging and high-pass, bidirectional digital filtering were used for analysis. The total duration of the QRS, the duration of the low-amplitude signals (< 40

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports suggest that the diagnostic criteria between normal and abnormal SAE values and the late potentials of QRS vary, depending on the equipment used and how the filters are set. However, according to these reports, values determined from a 95% confidence interval of normal subjects [3][4][5][6][7] or determined standard values for comparison of myocardial infarction patients with and without ventricular tachycardia [8][9][10] those criteria varied. The difference in RMS 20 caused by (F) and (B) filter direction was also observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports suggest that the diagnostic criteria between normal and abnormal SAE values and the late potentials of QRS vary, depending on the equipment used and how the filters are set. However, according to these reports, values determined from a 95% confidence interval of normal subjects [3][4][5][6][7] or determined standard values for comparison of myocardial infarction patients with and without ventricular tachycardia [8][9][10] those criteria varied. The difference in RMS 20 caused by (F) and (B) filter direction was also observed in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three parameters relating to ventricular late potential, such as filtered QRS duration (fQRS; msec), root mean square voltage (RMS; µV), and low amplitude signal duration (LAS; msec), were analyzed automatically and inspected. 12,13) Data with a noise level greater than 1 µV were excluded from the analysis. Statistical methods: Continuous variables are presented as the mean±SD, and discontinuous variables as the median and range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random electrical noise can be reduced from its level at the start of the study by the technique of signal averaging by a factor of 1/(n) 1/2 where n is the averaged number of cycles. 3,17 Signal-averaged ECG has allowed the detection of the terminal low amplitude high frequency electrical activity of the QRS complex on the body surface. The ambient noise level is likely to vary from study to study, patient to patient and site to site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%