Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the quality of life of Type 1 diabetes patients using insulin pumps and of those receiving multiple daily insulin injections

Abstract

Introduction Insulin pump therapy represents an alternative to multiple daily injections and can improve glycemic control and quality of life (QoL) in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. We aimed to explore the differences and factors related to the T1DM-specific QoL of such patients in Latvia. Design and methods A mixed-method cross-sectional study on 87 adult T1DM patients included 20 pump users and 67 users of injections who participated in the quantitative part of the study; 8 pump users and 13 injection users participated in the qualitative part. Patients were invited to participate using a dedicated digital platform. Their QoL and self-management habits were assessed using specially developed questionnaires adapted to Latvian conditions. Multiple logistic regression models were built to investigate the association between social and self-management factors and patients’ QoL. In addition, qualitative analysis of answers was performed. Results Insulin pump users were younger, had higher incomes, and reported higher T1DM expenses than users of multiple daily injections. There were no differences in self-management between the groups; Total QoL differed at the 0.1 significance level. In fully adjusted multiple logistic regression models, the most important factor that increased Total QoL was lower T1DM-related expenses (odds ratio, OR 7.02 [95% confidence interval 1.29; 38.0]). Men and those with more years of living with T1DM had better QoL (OR 9.62 [2.20; 42.1] and OR 1.16 [1.05; 1.29], respectively), but the method of administration was not significantly associated with QoL (OR 7.38 [0.87; 62.9]). Qualitative data supported the results of quantitative analysis. Conclusions QoL was the main reason to use an insulin pump, while the expense was the main reason to avoid the use of it or to stop using it. Reimbursement policies thus should be considered to enable patients to choose the more convenient method for themselves.

One Digital Health Intervention for Monitoring Human and Animal Welfare in Smart Cities: Viewpoint and Use Case

“…Indeed, using IoT may be challenging for different groups such as older adults as well as individuals with communication disabilities or limited abilities. Accordingly, even though IoT is taking health care to the next stage worldwide, it could paradoxically exclude some people who need it [ 6 , 114 ]. Therefore, a similar threat may affect the veterinary sector, whose development rate is still quite lagging behind that of human medicine.…”

Prediction of type 1 diabetes with machine learning algorithms based on FTIR spectral data in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

“…The development of a new diagnostic method is extremely important rstly for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases, to ensure simplied screening in populations with frequent certain autoimmune diseases, e.g., in Finland the incidence of T1D is 52.2 per 100 000 children, 57 in Sweden -39.6 per 100 000, 60 in Norway -33.6 per 100 000, 60 while the world average -15 per 100 000, 61 in turn in Latvia T1D incidence is lower than the world average -13.5 per 100 000. 62 Secondly a relatively low incidence does not reduce the importance of the method, it would be important in differential diagnostics in cases when it is necessary to nd out/clarify whether an autoimmune condition is responsible for unclear symptoms.…”

Monitoring Insulin and Glucose Levels in Hospital Najaf: A Critical Analysis of Diabetes Management

“…This study aimed to comprehensively assess diabetes management at Hospital Najaf, focusing on the monitoring of insulin and glucose levels. A mixed-methods approach was employed to gather both qualitative and quantitative data for a comprehensive analysis (Tzivian et al, 2022).…”