Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301) 2002
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2002.1024583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and qualitative comparisons of PLC programs for a small testbed with a focus on human issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dandachi et al [10] provided similar metrics to be applied to PLC programs given in Sequential Function Chart language. A different application of software measures is presented by Lucas and Tilbury in [11]. There, the complexity of solutions to the same problem described with different PLC languages is measured and compared.…”
Section: Software Quality and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dandachi et al [10] provided similar metrics to be applied to PLC programs given in Sequential Function Chart language. A different application of software measures is presented by Lucas and Tilbury in [11]. There, the complexity of solutions to the same problem described with different PLC languages is measured and compared.…”
Section: Software Quality and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk 1-10 An easy program, little risk [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Complex program, endurable risk 21-50 Very Complex program, high risk >50…”
Section: Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seven experiments by the author's team (4.2 -4.8) highlight different complex automation tasks and different automation systems characteristics as given in Table 1 [67] [68] demonstrate how task analysis could be usefully applied for the preliminary assessment of the effectiveness and perhaps even the efficiency of logic control design methodologies. Lucas [67] calculated the time to create a simple logic design program on the basis of low level user operations, e.g.…”
Section: Selected Usability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lucas [67] calculated the time to create a simple logic design program on the basis of low level user operations, e.g. keystrokes, mouse clicks and mental operations, for IEC 61131-3 Ladder Logic Diagrams (LL 405 min), Petri Nets (PN 1100 min) and modular Finite State machine logic (mFSM 1500 min) showing the significant difference given by the notation itself.…”
Section: Selected Usability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation