1994
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1994.1030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Patterns of Cerebral Language Dominance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in accord with previously established findings regarding the effects of epilepsy-related pathology (Gaillard et al, 2007;Kurthen et al, 1992Kurthen et al, , 1994Papanicolaou et al, 1999;Pataraia et al, 2004;Risse et al, 1997). This suggests a functional reorganization (i.e., complete or partial hemispheric shift) of language in response to the progressive pathology associated with epilepsy, but should not be generalized to other types of pathologies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in accord with previously established findings regarding the effects of epilepsy-related pathology (Gaillard et al, 2007;Kurthen et al, 1992Kurthen et al, , 1994Papanicolaou et al, 1999;Pataraia et al, 2004;Risse et al, 1997). This suggests a functional reorganization (i.e., complete or partial hemispheric shift) of language in response to the progressive pathology associated with epilepsy, but should not be generalized to other types of pathologies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, in patient samples sustaining long-term LH pathology, such as that typically associated with seizures, substantial deviations in the proportion of typical language organization can be found (Gaillard et al, 2007;Kurthen et al, 1992Kurthen et al, , 1994Papanicolaou et al, 1999;Pataraia et al, 2004;Springer et al, 1999;Risse, Gates, & Fangman, 1997). For example, Springer et al (1999) found differences in lateralization using a dominance classification criterion for fMRI data during semantic processing in persons with epilepsy compared to normal participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bayesian analysis is based on three key components: pretest probability, likelihood ratio, and posttest probability. The Bayes theorem formula to determine the posttest probability of hemispheric dominance, given a positive functional MR result (20,21), is as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intracarotid amobarbital tests (IAT) are performed in selected patients for the determination of language dominance, particularly in hemispherectomy and callosotomy candidates and in patients with epileptic foci close to or overlapping with putative language areas [13,16]. IAT for memory evaluation in TLE patients have largely been abandoned due to the insufficiency of this test for the prediction of postoperative memory performance in individual cases.…”
Section: Standard and Selective Carotid Amobarbital Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%