1985
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.71.2.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative angiography of the left anterior descending coronary artery: correlations with pressure gradient and results of exercise thallium scintigraphy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4); however, in the individual patient the score is not helpful to predict the severity of coronary stenosis, due to the considerable overlap of the values. Consistent with previous scintigraphic and echocardiographic studies [17][18][19][20], sensitivity was highest in patients with more severe lesions, of 70% or more, confirming that the prevalence of an ischemic response is primarily related to the severity of coronary stenosis. Based on our previous experience [12][13][14]21], these positive results cannot be extended to patients with disease of left circumflex or right coronary artery, in which the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography is slightly lower than that obtained by SPECT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…4); however, in the individual patient the score is not helpful to predict the severity of coronary stenosis, due to the considerable overlap of the values. Consistent with previous scintigraphic and echocardiographic studies [17][18][19][20], sensitivity was highest in patients with more severe lesions, of 70% or more, confirming that the prevalence of an ischemic response is primarily related to the severity of coronary stenosis. Based on our previous experience [12][13][14]21], these positive results cannot be extended to patients with disease of left circumflex or right coronary artery, in which the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography is slightly lower than that obtained by SPECT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…ARAS is generally evaluated using the diameter reduction as an index; this parameter, which is expressed as a percentage (% diameter reduction), is calculated as the relative reduction in the lumen diameter by an atheromatous lesion observed on angiography (1,2). Its use as an index for coronary artery stenosis, a context in which it is well correlated with cardiac perfusion (9)(10)(11), is believed to have influenced its use as an index for ARAS. However, the % diameter reduction is thought to be less effective for ARAS than for coronary artery stenosis; both its proximal and distal reference diameters which greatly influence the % diameter reduction, are frequently obscure, because ARAS often exists near the orifice of the renal artery and accompanies poststenotic dilatation (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the efficacy of modern therapeutic procedures in the catheterization laboratory,9 8 Over the last few years there has been an increasing interest in quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. The various systems used to date vary to a great extent, from manual procedures that implement a vernier caliper or comparable device'2-7 to a computerized manual edge-tracing procedure'8 and methods that make use of computer edge detection algorithms to determine arterial dimensions in a two-dimensional projection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%