1971
DOI: 10.2527/jas1971.33142x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Aspects of D- and L-Tryptophan utilization by the Young Pig

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For models CLP and ASY, requirement estimates were greater for ADG and ADFI than for G : F, which is in agreement with the results reported by Baker et al (1971) and Han et al (1993). The observation that ADFI is affected by the Trp supply (partly) explains the effect on ADG.…”
Section: Data Selection and Relevance Of The Recalculation Of The Nutsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For models CLP and ASY, requirement estimates were greater for ADG and ADFI than for G : F, which is in agreement with the results reported by Baker et al (1971) and Han et al (1993). The observation that ADFI is affected by the Trp supply (partly) explains the effect on ADG.…”
Section: Data Selection and Relevance Of The Recalculation Of The Nutsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the earliest research on the TRP requirement of pigs (Beeson, Mertz, and Shelton, 1949), the drastic influence of deficiency on appetite was noticed but later forgotten (Becker, Notzold, Jensen, Terrill, and Norton, 1955;Baker, Allen, Boomgaardt, Graber, and Norton, 1971;Boomgardt and Baker, 1973). Appetite depression was reemphasized (Henry and Pastuszewska, 1976) following the observation of a large decrease in feed intake when feeding pigs with Faba bean-based diets (Table I).…”
Section: Specific Role Of Tryptophan In the Appetite Of Pigs B Sevementioning
confidence: 99%
“…JMP software (SAS Institute Japan Ltd.) was used for statistical analyses, and statistically significant differences among all responses were determined by using the one‐way ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer HSD (honest significant difference) method. The results of the preliminary study were analyzed by a broken‐line model (Anderson & Nelson, ; Baker, Allen, Boomgaardt, Graber, & Norton, ) to determine the range of the linear response of weight gain to supplemental Trp intake for the slope‐ratio technique. Experimental data were subjected to regression analysis with JMP software, and tryptophan availability in SBM was estimated using common intercept multiple linear regression and the slope‐ratio technique (Adeola, ; Baker et al, ; Finney, ; Kosaka & Yoshida, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the preliminary study were analyzed by a broken‐line model (Anderson & Nelson, ; Baker, Allen, Boomgaardt, Graber, & Norton, ) to determine the range of the linear response of weight gain to supplemental Trp intake for the slope‐ratio technique. Experimental data were subjected to regression analysis with JMP software, and tryptophan availability in SBM was estimated using common intercept multiple linear regression and the slope‐ratio technique (Adeola, ; Baker et al, ; Finney, ; Kosaka & Yoshida, ). Supplemental Trp intake (mg/day, mg/3days) was used as an independent valuable, and weight gain (g/day) and NRR (%) were used as dependent valuables to estimate Trp availability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%