Quantitative assessment of a field-based course on integrative geology, ecology and cultural history

Abstract

A field-based course at the University of Arizona called Sense of Place (SOP) covers the geology, ecology and cultural history of the Tucson area. SOP was quantitatively assessed for pedagogical effectiveness. Students of the Spring 2008 course were given pre-and post-course word association surveys in order to assess awareness and comprehension of the geology, ecology and cultural history of the Tucson area. Students who had previously taken SOP (2005)(2006)(2007) and students who had never taken SOP also completed the survey. The survey consisted of 12 stimulus terms, all of which represent concepts integral to an understanding of environmental geography of the Tucson area. The students wrote words that they associate with each stimulus term. Differences between the preand post-course responses showed clear improvement in awareness and comprehension of the geology, ecology and cultural history of the Tucson area. Results from students who took SOP in past years indicate that long-term retention of course content is good. The word association technique proved to be effective for collecting data and evaluating the course. The field trips of SOP are described in the Appendix, which also contains the word association survey used in this research.

Creating Collaborative Learning Opportunities for Indigenous Youth with Archaeology-Based Environmental Education

“…• improves environmental stewardship (Sheppard et al 2010;Sobel 2004;van der Hoeven Kraft et al 2011).…”

Online but not remote: Adapting field‐based ecology laboratories for online learning

“…For instance, involvement in data collection and/or observations, practical activities that are integral parts of the scientific process, can increase students’ confidence and engagement with this process (Kloser et al., 2013) and help develop their data literacy by interacting with “authentic data” (Kjelvik & Schultheis, 2019). Similarly, working in field settings increases understanding of ecological concepts (Sheppard et al., 2010), as well as improve cognitive learning and performance (Easton & Gilburn, 2012). Learning in a field setting also helps increase self‐efficacy, GPA scores and graduation rates generally, but especially for students from under‐represented groups (Beltran et al., 2020).…”

The Field School Syllabus

“…A commonality among nearly all field schools is that they allow students to learn and practice the field methods used by professional archaeologists. Student participation in authentic field-based science experiences is an established pedagogical practice associated with positive learning outcomes and affective growth, highlighting the importance of the field school as a teaching tool (Cartrette and Melroe-Lehrman 2012;Cooper et al 2019;Flaherty et al 2017;Graham et al 2013;Jacobson et al 2015;Mogk and Goodwin 2012;Munge et al 2018;National Research Council 2014;O'Connell et al 2020;Richards et al 2012;Sheppard et al 2010;Whitmeyer and Mogk 2009).…”