2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of attribution of intentions to others in schizophrenia using an ecological video-based task: A comparison with manic and depressed patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, numerous conflicting findings exist. 47,62,163,164 They may stem from different emotional processing paradigms and from differences in the clinical status of patients in terms of medication use, illness burden, comorbidity and depression severity. For example, Scheuerecker and colleagues 69 recruited a heterogeneous sample of patients experiencing first-episode and recurrent depression and failed to find differences from controls in patterns of neural activation in response to emotional faces; given earlier behavioural and neuroimaging findings that cognitive processing is more vulnerable to disruption in patients with recurrent mood disorders than in first-episode patients (for example, see MacQueen and colleagues, 165 Basso and Bornstein, 166 Lebowitz and colleagues, 167 Milne and colleagues 168 and vanGorp and colleagues this null finding stemmed from the inclusion of first-episode patients in the mood disorders group.…”
Section: Mood Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, numerous conflicting findings exist. 47,62,163,164 They may stem from different emotional processing paradigms and from differences in the clinical status of patients in terms of medication use, illness burden, comorbidity and depression severity. For example, Scheuerecker and colleagues 69 recruited a heterogeneous sample of patients experiencing first-episode and recurrent depression and failed to find differences from controls in patterns of neural activation in response to emotional faces; given earlier behavioural and neuroimaging findings that cognitive processing is more vulnerable to disruption in patients with recurrent mood disorders than in first-episode patients (for example, see MacQueen and colleagues, 165 Basso and Bornstein, 166 Lebowitz and colleagues, 167 Milne and colleagues 168 and vanGorp and colleagues this null finding stemmed from the inclusion of first-episode patients in the mood disorders group.…”
Section: Mood Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings have been reported for patients with active and subsyndromal symptoms of bipolar disorder. 164,237 Importantly, these deficits appear to persist into the euthymic state in patients with MDD 238 and with bipolar disorder, 10,239,240 particularly for those ToM tasks that place high demands on cognitive processing resources (e.g., working memory, executive functioning; for an extended discussion of this issue, see McKinnon and colleagues 237 ).…”
Section: 228229mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, mental state decoding serves as the point at which these relations may first go awry. Most studies of social-cognitive reasoning in depression have found depressed individuals to perform similarly to healthy controls (HCs) [12,13]; however, a range of findings have emerged in the study of mental state decoding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although depressed patients might be generally less severely impaired in their everyday lives than patients with other mental disorders, such as autism and schizophrenia [31] [32], the impairment of social functioning, defined as "an individual's ability to perform and fulfil normal social roles," is considered a key sign of depression [33]. Dysfunction in social interactions remains persistent even 3 years after recovery from depressive symptoms [34] and is correlated with unemployment, disability and decreased work performance [35].…”
Section: Resilience In Patients With Mddmentioning
confidence: 99%