Targeting different cell surface
receptors with nanoparticle (NP)-based
platforms can result in differential particle binding properties that
may impact their localization, bioavailability, and, ultimately, the
therapeutic efficacy of an encapsulated payload. Conventional in vitro assays comparing the efficacy of targeted NPs often
do not adequately control for these differences in particle–receptor
binding, potentially confounding their therapeutic readouts and possibly
even limiting their experimental value. In this work, we characterize
the conditions under which NPs loaded with Bruton’s Tyrosine
Kinase (BTK) inhibitor differentially suppress primary B cell activation
when targeting either CD19 (internalizing) or B220 (noninternalizing)
surface receptors. Surface binding of fluorescently labeled CD19-
and B220-targeted NPs was analyzed and quantitatively correlated with
the number of bound particles at given treatment concentrations. Using
this binding data, suppression of B cell activation was directly compared
for differentially targeted (CD19 vs B220) NPs loaded with a BTK inhibitor
at a range of particle drug loading concentrations. When NPs were
loaded with lower amounts of drug, CD19-mediated internalization demonstrated
increased inhibition of B cell proliferation compared with B220 NPs.
However, these differences were mitigated when particles were loaded
with higher concentrations of BTK inhibitor and B220-mediated “paracrine-like”
delivery demonstrated superior suppression of cellular activation
when cells were bound to lower overall numbers of NPs. Taken together,
these results demonstrate that inhibition of B cell activation can
be optimized for NPs targeting either internalizing or noninternalizing
surface receptors and that particle internalization is likely not
a requisite endpoint when designing particles for delivery of BTK
inhibitor to B cells.