2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of contact and non-contact lateral force calibration methods for atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In FFM measurements, an ultra-nanocrystalline diamond tip (NaDiaProbes, Advanced Diamond Technologies) with tip radius of about 40 nm was scanned across the surfaces of these specimens via contact-mode AFM. For the quantitative force measurements using AFM, normal [43] and lateral [44] force calibrations were performed prior to FFM measurements. The force calibration results showed that the normal spring constant and lateral force sensitivity of the diamond tip used for FFM measurements were about 0.15 N/m and 1.04 mV/nN, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FFM measurements, an ultra-nanocrystalline diamond tip (NaDiaProbes, Advanced Diamond Technologies) with tip radius of about 40 nm was scanned across the surfaces of these specimens via contact-mode AFM. For the quantitative force measurements using AFM, normal [43] and lateral [44] force calibrations were performed prior to FFM measurements. The force calibration results showed that the normal spring constant and lateral force sensitivity of the diamond tip used for FFM measurements were about 0.15 N/m and 1.04 mV/nN, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nanocrystalline diamond tip (NaDiaProbes, Advanced Diamond Technologies) with a tip radius of about 40 nm was used in both the progressive-force and constant-force tests. For the quantitative determination of the normal and friction forces, the cantilevers were calibrated in both normal 70 and lateral 71,72 directions. On the basis of the force calibration results, the normal spring constant and lateral sensitivity of the diamond probe used for scratch tests were about 45 N/m and 0.02 mV/nN, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silicon probes with a nominal spring constant of 0.2 N/m (LFMR, Nanosensors) were used for contact mode imaging. For quantitative force measurement, normal and lateral force calibrations were performed prior to contact mode imaging. The normal force for contact mode imaging was initially set to 0.5 nN to minimize damage to the AFM probe and specimens during measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%