2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2019.100237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of landscape transformation using earth observation datasets in Shirui Hill of Manipur, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant topographic maps and imagery were geometrically rectified in 1:50,000 scale using geographic projection system UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator); spheroid and datum used were WGS 84 with UTM zone 46 N. Based on the reference data acquired in the field, visual image interpretation technique ( Garg et al., 1988 ) was performed to delineate land use and land cover viz., dense forest, open forest, degraded forest/grassland, agriculture and built up area. For spatial distribution of changes, matrix union of different land use land cover (LULC) classes was performed with assigned pixel size of 30 m ( Shimrah et al., 2019 ). The GIS and image processing software used include ArcGIS 10.1 and Erdas Imagine 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevant topographic maps and imagery were geometrically rectified in 1:50,000 scale using geographic projection system UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator); spheroid and datum used were WGS 84 with UTM zone 46 N. Based on the reference data acquired in the field, visual image interpretation technique ( Garg et al., 1988 ) was performed to delineate land use and land cover viz., dense forest, open forest, degraded forest/grassland, agriculture and built up area. For spatial distribution of changes, matrix union of different land use land cover (LULC) classes was performed with assigned pixel size of 30 m ( Shimrah et al., 2019 ). The GIS and image processing software used include ArcGIS 10.1 and Erdas Imagine 2014.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swotting the key findings from such studies and assessing their relevance for managing academic institutions can oblige as an imperative benchmark for academicians, policymakers, institutional planners, and natural resource managers. Shimrah et al [61]…”
Section: Learnings From Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in forest fragmentation is due to anthropogenic activities [71,72], it is due to the cultivation of paddy, minor fuelwood, and shifting cultivation for turmeric cultivation [73]. The area reported 40% of rice is cultivated in jhum sites [74] which is detrimental to forests, soil, and biodiversity [75][76]. Moreover, the mining activities are high in the area which ultimately affects the common herbal remedies used by the Jaiñtia tribe community namely Litsea khasiana, Aegle marmelos, Averrhoa carambola, Gaultheria fragrantissima, Gmelia arborea, Nepenthes khasiana, Oroxylum indicum, Rhododendron arborerum, Swertia chirayita, Ficus benghalensis, Taxus baccata, Mimosa pudica, Eupatorium cannabinum, Potentilla fulgens and Rubus ellipticus [77].…”
Section: Quantification Of the Spatial Pattern Of Forest Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%