2020
DOI: 10.1111/ene.14303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative assessment of sciatic nerve changes in Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A patients using magnetic resonance neurography

Abstract: Background and purpose Nerve tissue alterations have rarely been quantified in Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) patients. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively assess the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anomalies of the sciatic and tibial nerves in CMT1A disease using quantitative neurography MRI. It was also intended to seek for correlations with clinical variables. Methods Quantitative neurography MRI was used in order to assess differences in nerve volume, proton density and magnetization t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Bland-Altman plots for assessment of interreader reliability of magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) (a), transverse relaxation time T2 (b), and proton spin density (PSD) (c) of the sciatic nerve. The black continuous line represents the mean of all differences (bias), grey dotted lines show the 95% limits of agreement from 3.4 to 13%, and in three out of four studies a difference of over 4.7% was observed (Table 4) [11,12,14,24]. Notably, the mean MTR of our cohort was lower than in most of the control groups listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 Bland-Altman plots for assessment of interreader reliability of magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) (a), transverse relaxation time T2 (b), and proton spin density (PSD) (c) of the sciatic nerve. The black continuous line represents the mean of all differences (bias), grey dotted lines show the 95% limits of agreement from 3.4 to 13%, and in three out of four studies a difference of over 4.7% was observed (Table 4) [11,12,14,24]. Notably, the mean MTR of our cohort was lower than in most of the control groups listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The examined cohort was male, however, we would not expect different results for female participants, since all parameters have been shown to not systematically differ between sexes [33,41]. Furthermore, planning of the MR examination and image postprocessing were performed by experienced neuromuscular radiologists, and also for this reason the proposed orientational values should rather be [11,12,53]. To reduce the effects of B1 field inhomogeneities on the received signal, we applied an adaptive inline image filter and restricted analysis to six central slices where the B1 field is expected to be more homogeneous than at the edges of the slab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, MRI with various up-to-date imaging techniques has been applied to neuromuscular evaluation and attempts to derive potential imaging biomarkers for CMT1A patients. [17][18][19][20] Among them, Dixon MRI is an imaging technique increasingly used for fat fraction (FF) measurement. It has proved to be highly sensitive and reproducible for evaluating disease progression in the skeletal muscles of neuromuscular disorder patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, MRI with various up-to-date imaging techniques has been applied to neuromuscular evaluation and attempts to derive potential imaging biomarkers for CMT1A patients 17 20 . Among them, Dixon MRI is an imaging technique increasingly used for fat fraction (FF) measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%