“…Here we consider an effective solvent polarity measure, determined as the solvatochromic shift of the Franck–Condon (FC) excitation energy of chromophores. − The empirical polarity scale thus defined, such as the Kosower Z factor and E T (30), , gauges the solvating power of solvents, viz., solvent-induced stabilization of dipolar solutes. While this scale correlates well with ε 0 , especially for aprotic dipolar solvents, it yields considerably higher polarity for, e.g., nondipolar but quadrupolar solvents, such as benzene and supercritical carbon dioxide, than their ε 0 values. , This discrepancy arises from electrostatic interactions between the solute dipole and solvent quadrupole moments that are not accounted for in the conventional dielectric constant. − Since these interactions play an important role in solvent reorganization, the empirical polarity scale offers a better measure than ε 0 to describe solvation effects in various charge transfer and shift processes in this solvent class. − Analogously, due to ion monopole–solute dipole interactions, the solvating power and thus effective polarity of RTILs are substantially higher than the predictions made on the basis of their static dielectric constants. This trend was demonstrated by many earlier experiments − and simulations, − ,, where solvation stabilization of polar solutes in various RTILs was found to be comparable to and even exceed that in highly dipolar solvents.…”