Quantitative assessment of the jawbone quality classification: A meta-analysis study

Shemtov‐Yona, Keren

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253283

Cited by 17 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, only non‐molar sites were included. Therefore, the findings of this study should be interpreted with caution when making clinical decisions in molar sites 24,37 . Second, the effect of other local phenotypic characteristics (i.e., palatal bone thickness or gingival thickness) was not evaluated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Therefore, the findings of this study should be interpreted with caution when making clinical decisions in molar sites. 24,37 Second, the effect of other local phenotypic characteristics (i.e., palatal bone thickness or gingival thickness) was not evaluated. This was a deliberate decision considering the negligible effect that these variables have on post-extraction alveolar ridge dynamic, as reported in previous studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Alveolar ridge preservation reduces the need for ancillary bone augmentation in the context of implant therapy

Couso‐Queiruga

Mansouri

Alade

et al. 2022

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There is limited information on the need for bone augmentation in the context of delayed implant placement whether alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is previously performed or not. The primary aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy of ARP therapy after tooth extraction compared with unassisted socket healing (USH) in reducing the need for ancillary bone augmentation before or at the time of implant placement. Methods Adult subjects that underwent non‐molar single tooth extraction with or without simultaneous ARP therapy were included in this study. Cone beam computed tomography scans obtained before tooth extraction and after a variable healing period were used to record the baseline facial bone thickness and to virtually plan implant placement according to a standard method. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the effect of facial alveolar bone thickness upon tooth extraction and baseline therapy (USH or ARP) on the need for additional bone augmentation, adjusting for several covariates (i.e., age, sex, baseline KMW, and tooth type). Results One hundred and forty subjects that were equally distributed between both baseline therapy groups constituted the study population. Implant placement was deemed virtually feasible in all study sites. Simultaneous bone augmentation was considered necessary in 60% and 11.4% of the sites in the USH and ARP group, respectively. Most of these sites (64.2% in the USH group and 87.5% in the ARP group) exhibited a thin facial bone phenotype (<1 mm) at baseline. Logistic regression revealed that the odds of not needing ancillary bone augmentation were 17.8 times higher in sites that received ARP therapy. Furthermore, the need for additional bone augmentation was reduced 7.7 times for every 1 mm increase in facial bone thickness, regardless of baseline therapy. Conclusions Based on a digital analysis, ARP therapy, compared with USH, and thick facial alveolar bone largely reduce the need for ancillary bone augmentation at the time of implant placement in non‐molar sites.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alveolar ridge preservation reduces the need for ancillary bone augmentation in the context of implant therapy

Couso‐Queiruga

Mansouri

Alade

et al. 2022

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More common in maxillary sites, the presence of soft bone can make stabilization of fixation or tenting screws challenging, if not impossible. 70 As mentioned earlier while covering soft tissue related complications, wound closure plays a crucial role in the successful outcomes of RAP, especially when non-resorbable barrier membranes are indicated. 9,24-26,51 However, achieving tension free primary wound closure is not always possible, depending on the severity of the ridge collapse and lack of thick gingival tissues.…”

Section: Surgical Complications (At Time Of Surgery)mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…This, by itself, may cause some complications such as limited blood supply, despite decortication, and greater difficulty to insert fixation devices. More common in maxillary sites, the presence of soft bone can make stabilization of fixation or tenting screws challenging, if not impossible 70 …”

Section: Complications By Time Of Occurrencementioning

confidence: 99%

Complications following alveolar ridge augmentation procedures

Leblebicioglu,

Tatakis

2023

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral rehabilitation through implant supported dental restorations often requires a ridge augmentation procedure (RAP) prior to implant fixture placement since tooth extraction/loss results in alveolar ridge deficiencies. Although RAP‐related surgical techniques and biomaterials have been in practice for several decades, outcomes are not always predictable. Post‐surgical complications experienced during the early or late wound healing phases may jeopardize the targeted ideal ridge dimensions, required for implant fixture placement, and may have other consequences, such as negatively impacting the patient's quality of life. This review describes reported post‐surgical complications following RAP under the following subtitles: complications by tissue type, complications in function and aesthetics, complications by healing time, complications by biomaterial type, and complications by surgical protocol modalities. Specifically, RAP performed by using particulate bone graft substitutes and related complications are explored. Modalities developed to prevent/manage these complications are also discussed.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, when tooth loss occurs, alveolar ridge resorption [20,21] could bring a significant bone atrophy that increases more in the posterior region than in the anterior, also associated with an important bone density decrease [22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical and Radiographic Follow-Up of Full-Arch Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitations: Retrospective Clinical Study at 6-Year Follow-Up

Nagni,

Pirani,

D’Orto

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: the aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically full-arch implant prosthetic rehabilitations supported by six axial implants or four implants placed according to the All-on-Four protocol. Materials and methods: Patients in need of immediately loaded full-arch implant prosthetic rehabilitations of one or both arches were considered. Follow-up visits were performed one week after surgery, at 3 and 6 months and then once a year for the next 6 years to record implant survival, peri-implant parameters, marginal bone loss, bone cortical thickness and possible muscular, articular and prosthetic complications. A satisfaction evaluation questionnaire was also made available to all patients at the end of the follow-up period. Results: A total of 30 patients with total edentulism of one or both arches or need for avulsion of residual impaired teeth were enrolled for this study and underwent implant prosthetic rehabilitation on four or six implants. The overall implant survival rate at the six-year follow-up was 98.09%. Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between implant site and higher plaque and bleeding index in the posterior site. The extent of keratinized tissue was statistically superior in anteriorly located implants. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the values of bone-marginal levels as a function of time. The vestibular and palatal/lingual bone cortices were preserved, with an increasing trend in the apical direction. Regarding muscular and articular complications, the results of this study showed statistically significant differences between the mean values recorded in male and female subjects, while the most frequently encountered problems during the clinical evaluation were the presence of joint clicks and pain in the masseter muscles. Two of the patients examined showed problems with mandibular latero-deviation and prosthetic fracture. Conclusion: within the limitations of the present study, immediate implant-retained prosthetic rehabilitations supported by six axial implants or four fixtures placed according to the All-on-Four method could represent a valid therapeutic alternative to provide edentulous patients with restoration of masticatory function and aesthetics and promote their acceptance.

show abstract

Quantitative assessment of the jawbone quality classification: A meta-analysis study

Cited by 17 publications

References 55 publications

Alveolar ridge preservation reduces the need for ancillary bone augmentation in the context of implant therapy

Alveolar ridge preservation reduces the need for ancillary bone augmentation in the context of implant therapy

Complications following alveolar ridge augmentation procedures

Clinical and Radiographic Follow-Up of Full-Arch Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitations: Retrospective Clinical Study at 6-Year Follow-Up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About