2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10527-018-9826-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Assessment of the Quality of Treatment Planning for Patients with Advanced Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various authors have discussed the HI for gynecological cancer (Kataria et al, 2012;Lebedenko et al, 2018;Atiq et al, 2019), which gives a clear picture about the dose uniformity within the tumour. Hot and cold spots that affect the radiation outcome can be easily identified using this index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various authors have discussed the HI for gynecological cancer (Kataria et al, 2012;Lebedenko et al, 2018;Atiq et al, 2019), which gives a clear picture about the dose uniformity within the tumour. Hot and cold spots that affect the radiation outcome can be easily identified using this index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В соответствии с международными рекомендациями для технологий 3D-CRT, IMRT и RapidArc, HI рассчитывали по кумулятивной ГДО. Это отношение разницы дозы D 2 % около максимума, охватывающей 2 % мишени или критического органа, и минимального значения дозы, охватывающей 98 % объема мишени или критического органа D 98 %, к нормирующему значению D 50 % [4][5][6]. В идеальном случае, при HI = 0, дозовое распределение полностью однородное.…”
Section: индекс гомогенности дозы Hiunclassified