1998
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199801000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Assessment of Walking Activity after Total Hip or Knee Replacement*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
168
4
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
19
168
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Future versions of the IDEEA 1 system will be able to address this topic. The average number of steps taken per day by the patients in our study (6078 ± 3806) represents a 22% increase over averages reported previously (4988 steps per day in 111 patients) [36,52,53,63]. Although this increase is substantial, it does fall within the wide range of activity (395-17,718 steps per day) that has been described in the same studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Future versions of the IDEEA 1 system will be able to address this topic. The average number of steps taken per day by the patients in our study (6078 ± 3806) represents a 22% increase over averages reported previously (4988 steps per day in 111 patients) [36,52,53,63]. Although this increase is substantial, it does fall within the wide range of activity (395-17,718 steps per day) that has been described in the same studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The slight difference in computational prediction with the CMM measurements specifically at 3 rd and 4 th million load cycles is likley due to the individual variation in loading conditions and activity levels related to the explants. For example, a 45-fold difference between the least and most active patients fitted with hip or knee implants has been reported previously (Schmalzried et al, 1998).…”
Section: Cmm Wear Measurement Of Retrieved Femoral Tapersmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…An average of 1 million walking cycles per year has been assumed in this study; as such, the volumetric wear rates demonstrated are over 1 million walking steps (Schmalzried et al, 1998). The volumetric wear rates and total volume loss have been determined based on the reduction of element volume ("EVOL" field output from ABAQUS) for all the elements at the taper junction contact zone using a separate custom Python script linked as a user plug-in within ABAQUS.…”
Section: Finite Element Wear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant wear and secondary osteolysis are major causes of THA failure and are of particular concern in young patients undergoing THA because of long lifespans [7,20,26,33,38]. Therefore, alternative bearing surfaces have been introduced to minimize wear particle-induced implant failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%