1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81938-4_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Auswertung von Röntgen-Aufnahmen des Kopf-Hals-Gelenks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the high standard deviation of the Chihuahua indicated a large variance. In a comparison of ROM between large and small dogs, similar ROM values would be expected if the vertebral bodies were scaled, but this would not be due to differences in the morphology of the vertebral bodies ( 27 – 29 ). The results are consistent with subjective observations of gait analysis on the treadmill, whereas Chihuahuas, in comparison with Labrador retrievers, showed a more upright neck posture during locomotion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, the high standard deviation of the Chihuahua indicated a large variance. In a comparison of ROM between large and small dogs, similar ROM values would be expected if the vertebral bodies were scaled, but this would not be due to differences in the morphology of the vertebral bodies ( 27 – 29 ). The results are consistent with subjective observations of gait analysis on the treadmill, whereas Chihuahuas, in comparison with Labrador retrievers, showed a more upright neck posture during locomotion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The matching of the pairwise corresponding contours is performed by computer program (8). The positions of the cranium and the vertebra on both radiographs are digitized by marking some corresponding edge points or tracing corresponding contours.…”
Section: Computer-aided Evaluation Of the Mobilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, it is sufficient to digitize two pairs of points for each vertebra, but for increasing the accuracy it is recommended that some contours are traced. The matching of the pairwise corresponding contours is performed by computer program (8). Comparing the position of each vertebra relative to its neighbours before and after matching, the angles of mobility, and, additionally, the axes of rotation, are determined for each joint.…”
Section: Computer-aided Evaluation Of the Mobilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gross species-specific anatomy and head–neck posture in moving dogs as well as basic muscle activities seem to outrange breed-specific morphological characteristics.- Nevertheless, this result has to be tempered by a still relatively small study population. Multiple anatomical differences of the occiput, atlas and axis, like larger spheno-occipital angulation or the reduced craniocaudal and increased dorsoventral diameter of the atlas [ 6 , 43 46 ] are described in small breed and brachycephalic dogs. Presumably, these morphological variances could shift the centre of rotation of the CCJ joints cranially and induce differences in motion patterns and possible ranges of motion, but this was not detectable in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%