2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative calculation and optimized applications of ecological flow based on nature-based solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we propose a new concept, CEFs, which could be defined as comprehensive EFs for multiple guilds in view of ecosystem integrity to provide a more thorough physical habitat condition assessment by considering the biotic interactions (Kandziora et al., 2013). The traditional EFs assessment methodology focuses only on single target species or guild, and it has failed to consider the physical habitat requirements of other species or closely related multi‐guilds based on community interaction (Fu et al., 2021; Oyague et al., 2020; Tharme, 2003). As such, they consider only the physical habitat condition for fish, not the biological factors, such as food source (e.g., macroinvertebrates/plankton) or refugia from a predator (e.g., riparian vegetation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we propose a new concept, CEFs, which could be defined as comprehensive EFs for multiple guilds in view of ecosystem integrity to provide a more thorough physical habitat condition assessment by considering the biotic interactions (Kandziora et al., 2013). The traditional EFs assessment methodology focuses only on single target species or guild, and it has failed to consider the physical habitat requirements of other species or closely related multi‐guilds based on community interaction (Fu et al., 2021; Oyague et al., 2020; Tharme, 2003). As such, they consider only the physical habitat condition for fish, not the biological factors, such as food source (e.g., macroinvertebrates/plankton) or refugia from a predator (e.g., riparian vegetation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has shown that habitat simulation is a powerful approach for analyzing riverine ecosystems to obtain biotic and abiotic relationships and supports the EFs decision‐making for dam operation (Naderi et al., 2019; Oyague et al., 2020; Shim et al., 2016; Shirvell, 2010). However, such approaches face challenges due to data limitations and a lack of understanding of the interaction among aquatic organisms (Fu et al., 2021; Railsback, 2016). Here, we propose a new concept, CEFs, which could be defined as comprehensive EFs for multiple guilds in view of ecosystem integrity to provide a more thorough physical habitat condition assessment by considering the biotic interactions (Kandziora et al., 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's purpose is reconstructs the complete biological habitat; therefore, determining ecological flow is crucial. Referring to the scheme of the habitat method in related research (Fu et al 2021), the flow corresponding to the obvious turning point of the Q-WUA curve is taken as the minimum ecological flow of the corresponding stage of the target fish in the original river, and the flow corresponding to the highest point is the appropriate ecological flow. The biological habitats of the juvenile, adult, migration, and spawning stages of the target fish were numerically simulated to estimate the ecological flow in the river more comprehensively and accurately.…”
Section: Ecological Flow Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of hydraulic methods, Tharme [43] and Dunbar et al [44] propose the habitat simulation methods, to meet the requirements of representative species. Starting from the suitable habitat characteristics and the eco-environmental conditions, the habitat simulation methods establish the response relationship between a habitat area and flow through numerical simulation, such as the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) [45,46], Computer-Aided Simulation Model for Instream Flow Requirements in Diverted Stream (CASIMIR) [47,48] and physical habitat simulation model (PHABSIM) [49][50][51]. The methods consider limited river biological species, and encounter difficulty in reflecting the overall situation of a river ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%