2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63458-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Characterisation of Surface Texture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Choosing a set of significant parameters which are functionally correlated is a notoriously difficult topic. The solutions in engineering are usually based on a large amount of empirical experimental data [8]. Very little progress has been made in this area except where a excellent correlation model has been developed, by which the functionalities and the surface geometric characteristics are connected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Choosing a set of significant parameters which are functionally correlated is a notoriously difficult topic. The solutions in engineering are usually based on a large amount of empirical experimental data [8]. Very little progress has been made in this area except where a excellent correlation model has been developed, by which the functionalities and the surface geometric characteristics are connected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little progress has been made in this area except where a excellent correlation model has been developed, by which the functionalities and the surface geometric characteristics are connected. In the recent few years, some generic methods have been suggested or used, such as parameter classification [6,8], Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) and correlation analysis [9]. In this case study, the ANOVA method is adopted as a tool to show functional correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7) generated on the machined surface [2,3]. The maximum depth of valleys is between 0.35 and 0.55 μm and their widths 0.08 and 0.16 μm depending on the sequence of machining operations performed.…”
Section: Characterization Of Function-related Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special attention in this area has been given during two past decades to the standardization of 3D set roughness parameters [1][2][3]. Precision machining with Rz=2.5-4 μm and high-precision machining with Rz<1 μm of hardened steels (45-60 HRC) with ultrahard cutting tool materials have been developed with a special interest to automotive, hydraulic, and die and mold industry sectors [4,5] due to high flexibility, possible complete machining, lesser ecological impact, and higher MRR [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Surface roughness is often treated as an index of the product quality [7]. The surface roughness parameters may be used to explain the functional properties of the surfaces under mating [8][9]. The 2D surface parameters though used widely are not enough to explain the functionality of surfaces as the surfaces interact in three dimensions rather than in two dimensions [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%