2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative characterization of surface wettability by friction force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the shear displacement of a liquid bridge becomes large enough to cause a moving wetting line, both the left–right contact angle difference and the lateral capillary force are maximized. , Similar results were also observed in tilted plate or forced liquid drop sliding experiments. In studies in which the wetting line speed was constant, the lateral adhesion force was found to be generally proportional to the contact width of the liquid ( w ), the liquid surface tension ( γ LA ), and the difference in cosines of the left and right contact angles (cos θ l – cos θ r ). ,, In experiments in which the wetting line speed was varied, the lateral adhesion force was found to increase linearly with the wetting line speed. ,, Gao et al found such a monotonic relation was valid only if the capillary number (Ca) was >10 –5 . The linear relation between wetting line speed U and the lateral capillary force was best explained by the linear form of the notable contact line friction hypothesis, F W = Uζ = Uk B T /κ 0 λ 3 , where F W is the lateral force per unit contact line width, ζ the coefficient of wetting line friction, k B the Boltzmann constant, T the absolute temperature, κ 0 the equilibrium frequency of the random molecular displacements, and λ the microscopic distance between adsorption sites on the solid surface …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…When the shear displacement of a liquid bridge becomes large enough to cause a moving wetting line, both the left–right contact angle difference and the lateral capillary force are maximized. , Similar results were also observed in tilted plate or forced liquid drop sliding experiments. In studies in which the wetting line speed was constant, the lateral adhesion force was found to be generally proportional to the contact width of the liquid ( w ), the liquid surface tension ( γ LA ), and the difference in cosines of the left and right contact angles (cos θ l – cos θ r ). ,, In experiments in which the wetting line speed was varied, the lateral adhesion force was found to increase linearly with the wetting line speed. ,, Gao et al found such a monotonic relation was valid only if the capillary number (Ca) was >10 –5 . The linear relation between wetting line speed U and the lateral capillary force was best explained by the linear form of the notable contact line friction hypothesis, F W = Uζ = Uk B T /κ 0 λ 3 , where F W is the lateral force per unit contact line width, ζ the coefficient of wetting line friction, k B the Boltzmann constant, T the absolute temperature, κ 0 the equilibrium frequency of the random molecular displacements, and λ the microscopic distance between adsorption sites on the solid surface …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…There are many more of these types of surfaces, on which water droplets show anisotropic wetting behaviors [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Inspired by the anisotropic surfaces found in nature, engineered surfaces with anisotropic wetting properties could contribute significantly to the fields, such as biomedicine, ship transportation, microfluidics, smart surfaces, and so on [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, on the surface composed of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) triangular-micropillar array, with the period ranging from 40 to 50 µm, a negligible difference in the SAs (ΔSA = 3°) in opposite directions can be found [ 16 ]. Similarly, on the microstrip surfaces, with the air fraction ranging from 0.20 to 0.50, the water droplets kept sticking to the surface when the surface was turned upside down along the direction perpendicular to the microstrips [ 17 ]. In both cases, there is no difference in the SA along certain directions, even though the surface structures are distinctly different [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations