2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative ChIP-Seq Normalization Reveals Global Modulation of the Epigenome

Abstract: Epigenomic profiling by chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with massively parallel DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) is a prevailing methodology used to investigate chromatin-based regulation in biological systems such as human disease, but the lack of an empirical methodology to enable normalization among experiments has limited the precision and usefulness of this technique. Here, we describe a method called ChIP with reference exogenous genome (ChIP-Rx) that allows one to perform genome-wide quantitative compari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
495
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(497 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
495
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Pol III ChIP-seq from mouse cells under different experimental conditions was normalized by adding internal standard chromatin isolated from human cells (Bonhoure et al, 2014). Similarly, H3K79me2 ChIP from human cell lines treated with a specific Dot1L inhibitor was recently calibrated with Drosophila chromatin (Orlando et al, 2014). Although these approaches have value in making comparative measurements, the internal controls are not well defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Pol III ChIP-seq from mouse cells under different experimental conditions was normalized by adding internal standard chromatin isolated from human cells (Bonhoure et al, 2014). Similarly, H3K79me2 ChIP from human cell lines treated with a specific Dot1L inhibitor was recently calibrated with Drosophila chromatin (Orlando et al, 2014). Although these approaches have value in making comparative measurements, the internal controls are not well defined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein we demonstrate that ICeChIP measurements of histone modification density are precise, accurate, and reproducible, rendering ChIP robust to handling differences and preserving quantitative relationships between samples. Unlike other attempts to calibrate ChIP with chromatin from other organisms (Bonhoure et al, 2014; Orlando et al, 2014), our method measures actual amounts of marks using defined standards and can provide in situ evaluation of the specificity of the immunoprecipitation and a means of data correction. ICeChIP also enables direct and unbiased comparison amongst experiments: we present quantitative analyses of patterns of histone marks that reinterprets the nature of bivalent domains (Bernstein et al, 2006; Mikkelsen et al, 2007)), and suggest a correlation between the mark symmetry of promoter nucleosomes and transcriptional output.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2E). Consequently, normalizing to sequencing depth in this case misrepresents the relative signal between the two genotypes (Orlando et al 2014). We therefore developed an alternative procedure that uses Drosophila virilis chromatin as an internal normalization control (see the Supplemental Material).…”
Section: H3k9 Regulates Chromocenter Organization and Nucleosome Occumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described above, a recent study successfully used the Drosophila epigenome as a normalization control for ChIP-seq analysis of H3K79me2 in human cells (7).…”
Section: What Exactly Is a Spike-in Control?mentioning
confidence: 99%