2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10160-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative-comparative research on digital competence in students, graduates and professors of faculty education: an analysis with ANOVA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They still possess a level of competence that is more technical and communicative than pedagogical, as the educational potential of ICT is not exploited for its effective incorporation in teaching-learning processes (teaching and evaluation) as well as in relation to research. This is corroborated by previous research which has found that university teaching staff have tended to develop their digital pedagogical competence in different ways [9][10][11][12]46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They still possess a level of competence that is more technical and communicative than pedagogical, as the educational potential of ICT is not exploited for its effective incorporation in teaching-learning processes (teaching and evaluation) as well as in relation to research. This is corroborated by previous research which has found that university teaching staff have tended to develop their digital pedagogical competence in different ways [9][10][11][12]46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For example, engineering teachers are in constant use with technologies, however, as pointed out by Rodriguez and Martinez (2015), they do not use them from a didactic point of view. These findings are important so that when training courses for teachers are carried out, each area of knowledge has the appropriate course for its pedagogical or instrumental deficiencies, allowing for a correct use of the technology in the different teaching-learning scenarios (Cabero-Almenara and Barroso 2016; Pozos and Tejada 2018;Mercader 2019Mercader , 2020Pérez-Díaz 2019;Guillén-Gámez and Mayorga-Fernández, 2020b;Padilla-Hernández et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are few studies that jointly analyze and compare the DCE in each of the fields of knowledge where the professors are ascribed to, with the aim of establishing specific training actions that are adapted to the professional context within which the professors develop their academic work. Reducing this training deficit will allow the correct use of the technology in teaching-learning scenarios that are suitable to their educational and research profiles (Cabero-Almenara and Barroso 2016;Pozos and Tejada 2018;Mercader 2019Mercader , 2020Pérez-Díaz 2019;Guillén-Gámez and Mayorga-Fernández 2020a;Padilla-Hernández et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, effective integration of audiovisual media technologies at all educational levels and disciplines (including adult education) also requires dedicated and talented educators (see Guillén-Gámez and Mayorga-Fernández 2020;Nicolaou and Kalliris 2020;Ngah et al 2019), especially regarding educators of media studies education, due to their scientific field (see Crawford et al 2020;Matsiola et al 2019;Nicolaou et al 2019). In conclusion, all the educators, regardless of which educational levels and disciplines they work in, should need to combine communication techniques through audiovisual media communications within the educational process and the processes of appropriation and use of ICTs in teaching practices (see Brenes-Monge et al 2020;Esteve-Faubel et al 2020;Nicolaou 2020;Frolova et al 2019;Griva et al 2019;Ryabova et al 2018;Veglis and Avraam 2001).…”
Section: Background and Literature Review And/or Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%