2019
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Comparison of Conventional and t-SNE-guided Gating Analyses

Abstract: Dimensionality reduction using the t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm has emerged as a popular tool for visualizing high-parameter single-cell data. While this approach has obvious potential for data visualization it remains unclear how t-SNE analysis compares to conventional manual hand-gating in stratifying and quantitating the frequency of diverse immune cell populations. We applied a comprehensive 38-parameter mass cytometry panel to human blood and compared the frequencies of 28… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the CyTOF data was normalized, a t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm was run to determine immune cell clusters in an unsupervised manner using FlowSOM by R 3.6.0 programming. viSNE plots were also analyzed in the same manner [ 26 ]. Independent t-test were performed for the endothelial cellular experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the CyTOF data was normalized, a t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm was run to determine immune cell clusters in an unsupervised manner using FlowSOM by R 3.6.0 programming. viSNE plots were also analyzed in the same manner [ 26 ]. Independent t-test were performed for the endothelial cellular experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific to LSA, k-medoid clustering that produced 9 clusters for downstream analysis was provided. In addition, graph-based clustering and visualization via t-SNE were provided 26 , and the data were normalized to unit norms before performing graph-based clustering and t-SNE projection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD3, CD4 and Viability Dye were removed from the t-SNE and Phenograph analysis. In order to choose the analysis parameters for the t-SNE and Phenograph analysis, the data were run with increasing perplexity (from 10 to 10 starting at 30 as the default value) for t-SNE and increasing k value (from 5 to 5, starting at 30) for Phenograph (36). From a perplexity of 80 and above, the clustering did not significantly change anymore.…”
Section: Analysis Of Flow Cytometry Data With T-sne and Phenographmentioning
confidence: 99%