2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative contribution of resistance sources of components to stack performance for solid oxide electrolysis cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degradation phenomena must also be identified, understood and eliminated or reduced. Over the last few years, some reports on solid oxide electrolysis stacks have been published (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). To our knowledge, only a limited number of studies on the detailed post analysis of a stack have been published so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Degradation phenomena must also be identified, understood and eliminated or reduced. Over the last few years, some reports on solid oxide electrolysis stacks have been published (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). To our knowledge, only a limited number of studies on the detailed post analysis of a stack have been published so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years, some reports on solid oxide electrolysis stacks have been published. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] To our knowledge, only a limited number of studies on the detailed post analysis of a stack have been published so far. In 2017, Rinaldi et al 10 published test results of an electrolysis stack, which was tested for 10 700 h at −0.5 A • cm −2 with a degradation rate of 0.5% kh −1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows the characteristic electrochemical values of the 12 stack repeat units, specifically OCVs, electrolysis voltages and area specific resistances (ASR), at 70% steam conversion rate which were extracted from the jV-behavior of Figure 6. of other research groups [20,21]. However, in contrast to the OCV, higher differences in the electrolysis voltages and in the ASRs of the RUs can be observed.…”
Section: Solar Steam Generationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This value is slightly smaller compared to the measured ones in Figure 8 which can be explained by the assumption of ideal interfaces between the different layers of the components of the repeat unit. However, post-test analysis of stacks operated in SOFC at DLR 39 and results of other research groups 40 have shown that especially the electrical contact of the air electrode may contain additional ohmic contributions. In this context the material and structure of the air electrode contact paste can play an important role.…”
Section: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy-mentioning
confidence: 97%