any pivotal trials have demonstrated that the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) has significantly decreased the rate of restenosis and the need for recurrent intervention compared with bare metal stents (BMS). 1,2 In the real world, the SES is used for more complex lesions and favorable results have been achieved for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially a reduction in the need for revascularization. [3][4][5][6][7] Coronary artery disease (CAD) is now the main cause of death in women. 8 The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study demonstrated that women, especially older women, are particularly at risk of increased morbidity and mortality. [9][10][11] Other studies evaluating the outcome of PCI have also reported higher rates of mortality and major complications in women compared with men. [12][13][14][15][16] Therefore, it is possible that the poor outcome of PCI in elderly women is related to the development of severe atherosclerotic changes, probably because of clustering of coronary risk factors. However, there is a lack of data regarding the characteristics and prognosis in elderly women with CAD, and it remains unknown whether SES reduces the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and improves the prognosis in this particular population.
Methods
PatientsFrom April Of the total, 1,232 patients were treated in the BMS era and 1,365 patients were treated in the SES era. Patients with a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and patients with chronic total occlusion were excluded from the study because of the difficulty of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis. In addition, patients treated with balloon angioplasty, rotational atherectomy or directional coronary atherectomy alone were also excluded. In the SES era, we excluded patients treated with BMS that had been indicated because of planned surgery, intolerance of ticlopidine or the presence of large vessels >4.0 mm diameter. In the Osaka area, the Committee of Reimbursement for Health Insurance recommends that SES should not be used for patients with acute coronary syndrome, so patients treated with a BMS for acute coronary syndrome in the SES era were also excluded. Thus, the number of patients treated with a BMS in the SES era was 216 and that with SES was 704, and the percentage use of SES in the SES era was 52%. Finally, 670 patients were included in the BMS era and 704 in the SES era. We then subdivided these populations into 4 groups according to gender and age: men <75 years old, men ≥75 years old, women <75 years old, women ≥75 years old. 17,18 The Ethical Review Board gave approval and the study was conducted according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All subjects gave signed informed consent. (Received May 1, 2008; revised manuscript received January 8, 2009; accepted February 3, 2009; released online April 28, 2009
Background:The angiographic characteristics and prognosis in elderly women in relation to the therapeutic impact of sirol...