2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative correlation between counterion (X) binding affinity to cationic micelles and X – Induced micellar growth for substituted iodobenzoates (X)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of K Br X or R Br X (Tables 1, 2), can also be explained by the following order: FBzNa \ ClBz-Na \ BrBzNa \ IBzNa. This can be attributed to the polarizability difference, as well as the electronegativity of the halogen substituent [31]. The values of K Br X or R Br X increase with the decrease and increase in electronegativity [27] d Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of K Br X or R Br X (Tables 1, 2), can also be explained by the following order: FBzNa \ ClBz-Na \ BrBzNa \ IBzNa. This can be attributed to the polarizability difference, as well as the electronegativity of the halogen substituent [31]. The values of K Br X or R Br X increase with the decrease and increase in electronegativity [27] d Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the extent of the catalytic effects of CTABr/MX/ H 2 O can give the value of the ion exchange constant, K Br X [26]. The values of K Br X for X = mono-substituted halobenzoate ions at constant [CTABr] T (where CTABr and [] T represent cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and total concentration, respectively) have been determined and listed elsewhere [27][28][29][30][31]. Furthermore, these counterions are known to affect the structural features of cationic micelles nanoparticles [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%