Quantitative cost comparison of on-premise and cloud infrastructure based EEG data processing

Abstract

High-density, high-sampling rate EEG measurements generate large amounts of measurement data. When coupled with sophisticated processing methods, this presents a storage, computation and system management challenge for research groups and clinical units. Commercial cloud providers offer remote storage and on-demand compute infrastructure services that seem ideal for outsourcing the usually burst-like EEG processing workflow execution. There is little available guidance, however, on whether or when users should migrate to the cloud. The objective of this paper is to investigate the factors that determine the costs of on-premises and cloud execution of EEG workloads, and compare their total costs of ownership. An analytical cost model is developed that can be used for making informed decisions about the long-term costs of on-premises and cloud infrastructures. The model includes the cost-critical factors of the computing systems under evaluation, and expresses the effects of length of usage, system size, computational and storage capacity needs. Detailed cost models are created for on-premises clusters and cloud systems. Using these models, the costs of execution and data storage on clusters and in the cloud are investigated in detail, followed by a break-even analysis to determine when the use of an on-demand cloud infrastructure is preferable to on-premises clusters. The cost models presented in this paper help to characterise the cost-critical infrastructure and execution factors, and can support decision-makers in various scenarios. The analyses showed that cloud-based EEG data processing can reduce execution time considerably and is, in general, more economical when the computational and data storage requirements are relatively low. The cloud becomes competitive even in heavy load case scenarios if expensive, high quality, high-reliability clusters would be used locally. While the paper focuses on EEG processing, the models can be easily applied to CT, MRI, fMRI based neuroimaging workflows as well, which can provide guidance to the wider neuroimaging community for making infrastructure decisions.

Noise-based cyberattacks generating fake P300 waves in brain–computer interfaces

“…In other cases, the density and high frequency of the EEG signal make it challenging to process the signal locally. Juhasz [10] discussed the possibility of migrating local clusters to a cloud infrastructure, significantly reducing execution time and ensuring data security.…”

Exploring Scalable, Distributed Real-Time Anomaly Detection for Bridge Health Monitoring

“…Using one of the most efficient standard protocol stacks available today, the Narrow Band Internet of Things (NB-IoT) [54], which has demonstrated optimal performance in the SHM field, the system consumes up to 0.94 J for a typical transmission of 500 bytes in the open space, decreasing the maximum lifetime of the SHM nodes and thus needing solutions such as energy harvesting [55] or a wired sensor. Furthermore, the different cloud service providers such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google account for data computation costs as pay-to-go, with the client paying for the computational time exploited [56], also making the money invested in this service not negligible. Therefore, a complete cloud paradigm for anomaly detection causes a higher maintenance cost and shortens the lifetime of the SHM nodes, demanding more frequent interventions on the installation.…”

Advanced Bioelectrical Signal Processing Methods: Past, Present and Future Approach—Part II: Brain Signals

“…It is also important to mention that the EEG can be used as a first-line method for diagnosis of tumors, stroke and other brain disorders, but its applicability has decreased with the invention and development of high-resolution anatomical imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) [ 45 , 46 , 47 ]. Despite the limited spatial resolution, the EEG continues to be a valuable tool for research and diagnostics purposes.…”

“…Despite the limited spatial resolution, the EEG continues to be a valuable tool for research and diagnostics purposes. It is one of the few mobile techniques available and offers millisecond-range temporal resolution which is not possible to be obtained with the use of CT, PET, or MRI, however, some of the modern systems combine all these methods together—creating the so-called hybrid methods [ 20 , 46 , 47 ].…”