2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2021.148399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative density gradient analysis by mass spectrometry (qDGMS) and complexome profiling analysis (ComPrAn) R package for the study of macromolecular complexes

Abstract: Many cellular processes involve the participation of large macromolecular assemblies. Understanding their function requires methods allowing to study their dynamic and mechanistic properties. Here we present a method for quantitative analysis of native protein or ribonucleoprotein complexes by mass spectrometry following their separation by density – qDGMS. Mass spectrometric quantitation is enabled through stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). We provide a complete guide, from exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent critical appraisal exposed a surprisingly high false discovery rate of global complexomic analyses, when complex membership is called by direct matching of protein distributions (Shatsky et al, 2016). This happens despite the ever more sophisticated bioinformatic pipelines used for the analysis of complexomic data (Dong et al, 2008;Havugimana et al, 2012;Kristensen et al, 2012;Giese et al, 2014;Gazestani et al, 2016;Páleníková et al, 2021a). The problem comes, on the one side, from natural spurious overlapping of unrelated profiles, and on the other, from the general analytical caveat of matching algorithms: most statistical measures are inherently tailored to look for differences, not similarities (Motulsky, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent critical appraisal exposed a surprisingly high false discovery rate of global complexomic analyses, when complex membership is called by direct matching of protein distributions (Shatsky et al, 2016). This happens despite the ever more sophisticated bioinformatic pipelines used for the analysis of complexomic data (Dong et al, 2008;Havugimana et al, 2012;Kristensen et al, 2012;Giese et al, 2014;Gazestani et al, 2016;Páleníková et al, 2021a). The problem comes, on the one side, from natural spurious overlapping of unrelated profiles, and on the other, from the general analytical caveat of matching algorithms: most statistical measures are inherently tailored to look for differences, not similarities (Motulsky, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other separation techniques, such as clear native PAGE, sucrose gradient centrifugation, and size exclusion chromatography, have been successfully used to partition complexes by size and shape (Andersen et al, 2003;Peltier et al, 2006;Hartman et al, 2007;Chen and Williamson, 2013;Kirkwood et al, 2013;Larance et al, 2016;Páleníková et al, 2021a). However, the majority of complexomic studies now rely on a combination of orthogonal fractionation methods, thus decreasing the probability of chance co-elution for proteins involved in closely migrating but otherwise unrelated assemblies.…”
Section: Profiling Cellular Complexes With Complexomic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To investigate the mechanistic basis for the defect in mitochondrial translation, the composition of mitochondrial ribosomes was assessed using quantitative density gradient analysis by mass spectrometry -qDGMS (Páleníková et al, 2021). While no shifts in the sedimentation profile of mitoribosomal components were observed, proteins of the mtLSU were enriched upon MRM2 depletion (Figure 4 and Figure S4), indicating the accumulation of mature or near-mature forms of this subunit.…”
Section: Mrm2 Is Involved In the Late Stages Of Mtlsu Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure followed that described for quantitative analysis of density gradients by mass spectrometry (qDGMS) in (Páleníková et al, 2021). In brief, cells were cultured in DMEM for SILAC, supplemented with 20% dialysed FBS, 50 mg mL -1 uridine, 1x penicillin-streptomycin, 200 mg L -1 L-proline, and either 0.398 mM L-arginine and 0.798 mM L-lysine, or 0.398 mM 13 C6, 15 N4-L-arginine and 0.798 mM 13 C6, 15 N2-Llysine.…”
Section: Assessment Of Mitoribosome Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%