2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative detection of Campylobacter jejuni with a core-satellite assemblies-based dual-modular aptasensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serological methods (i.e., immunoassays) (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELISA) [124][125][126][127][128], biosensors for the on-site detection of foodborne pathogens [129,130], DNA hybridization techniques (e.g., loop-mediated isothermal amplification; LAMP) [126,131,132], DNA fingerprinting techniques (e.g., multilocus sequence typing; MLST) [133][134][135], mass spectrometry techniques (e.g., matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight; MALDI-TOF) [136] and above all PCR-based method and techniques (e.g., multiplex PCR; mPCR, quantitative or real-time PCR; qPCR/rt-PCR), have been developed for the fastest and most efficient identification and differentiation of Campylobacter species among other foodborne pathogens. It should be noted though that some DNA fingerprinting techniques are more sophisticated (e.g., pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; PFGE, whole-genome sequencing; WGS) and require well-trained personnel with the know-how to conduct the technique and interpret the data.…”
Section: Molecular Methods For Differentiating Campylobacter Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological methods (i.e., immunoassays) (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELISA) [124][125][126][127][128], biosensors for the on-site detection of foodborne pathogens [129,130], DNA hybridization techniques (e.g., loop-mediated isothermal amplification; LAMP) [126,131,132], DNA fingerprinting techniques (e.g., multilocus sequence typing; MLST) [133][134][135], mass spectrometry techniques (e.g., matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight; MALDI-TOF) [136] and above all PCR-based method and techniques (e.g., multiplex PCR; mPCR, quantitative or real-time PCR; qPCR/rt-PCR), have been developed for the fastest and most efficient identification and differentiation of Campylobacter species among other foodborne pathogens. It should be noted though that some DNA fingerprinting techniques are more sophisticated (e.g., pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; PFGE, whole-genome sequencing; WGS) and require well-trained personnel with the know-how to conduct the technique and interpret the data.…”
Section: Molecular Methods For Differentiating Campylobacter Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological methods (i.e., immunoassays) (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELISA) [124][125][126][127][128], biosensors for the on-site detection of foodborne pathogens [129,130], DNA hybridization techniques (e.g., loop-mediated isothermal amplification; LAMP) [126,131,132], DNA fingerprinting techniques (e.g., multilocus sequence typing; MLST) [133][134][135] and above all PCR-based method and techniques (e.g., multiplex PCR; mPCR, quantitative or real time PCR; qPCR/rt-PCR), have been developed for the fastest and most efficient identification and differentiation of Campylobacter species among other foodborne pathogens. It should be noted though that some DNA fingerprinting techniques are more sophisticated (e.g., pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; PFGE, whole-genome sequencing; WGS) and require well-trained personnel with a know-how-to conduct the technique and interpret the data.…”
Section: Molecular Methods For Differentiating Campylobacter Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is achieved through target synchronization involving different detectors, rather than quantifying the same sample using different techniques. 22 The responses of dual-mode probes compared to single-signal analysis do not interfere with each other and are independent of each other. This technology can inhibit fluctuations in examination data within a complex food matrix and enable mutual verification, thereby enhancing the reliability, accuracy, and range of diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%