2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1387-3806(02)00585-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative determination of noncovalent binding interactions using soft ionization mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

11
504
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 458 publications
(516 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
11
504
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the protein-DNA interactions, electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonds significantly contribute to the binding of the complex in addition to hydrophobic interactions. As discussed by Daniel et al, interaction energies based on charges, dipoles, and polarizability are expected to increase when going from solution to the gas phase, but hydrophobic interaction is substantially weaker in the absence of solvent [6]. Therefore, in case of a protein-DNA noncovalent complex, it might be possible to detect a weakly bound complex with the Kd of 10 Ϫ6 M if the sample can be prepared at this concentration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the protein-DNA interactions, electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonds significantly contribute to the binding of the complex in addition to hydrophobic interactions. As discussed by Daniel et al, interaction energies based on charges, dipoles, and polarizability are expected to increase when going from solution to the gas phase, but hydrophobic interaction is substantially weaker in the absence of solvent [6]. Therefore, in case of a protein-DNA noncovalent complex, it might be possible to detect a weakly bound complex with the Kd of 10 Ϫ6 M if the sample can be prepared at this concentration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consequently, positive correlation was obtained between V 50% and relative binding free energy change (⌬⌬G) [1]. In addition, ESI-MS has allowed successful detection of noncovalent complexes of biomolecules [2][3][4][5][6]. Direct observation of molecular ions of noncovalent complexes is significant in understanding protein function, because it suggests a target, specificity, and stoichiometry of the specific binding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike these techniques, MS is capable of resolving any free/bound species at equilibrium in solution, even when such species possess very similar spectroscopic characteristics. With proper experimental design and data treatment, their respective signal intensities can be employed to obtain relative [121,122] and absolute [123][124][125][126][127][128] dissociation constants (K d 's) in solution, matching those afforded by established methods [129]. In this direction, competitive binding experiments in which multiple ligands are mixed simultaneously with the substrate of interest have proven very effective in providing relative scales of binding affinities based on the aspect ratio and distribution of the detected complexes [130 -133].…”
Section: Elucidating Structure-function Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four primary factors influence the observed dissociation energies of the polyether/ammonium ion complexes: the gas-phase basicities of the polyether and amine, steric effects of the amines, conformational flexibility of the polyethers, and the inhibition of intramolecular hydrogen bonds of the guest ammonium ions in the resulting ammonium/polyether noncovalent complexes. E lectrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is being increasingly used for the analysis of noncovalent complexes, especially those involving biomolecules, because it is a "soft" method for the transfer of solution species into the gas phase [1][2][3][4][5]. A key question revolves around the nature of the noncovalent complexes once they enter the gas phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%