2023
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative determination of plasma cabozantinib concentration using HPLC–UV and its application to patients with renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: Cabozantinib is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has become a standard of care for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, cabozantinib is associated with a high rate of adverse events. Therefore, individualised cabozantinib administration and monitoring could help maximise its therapeutic efficacy and avoid serious adverse events. This study developed and validated a method to determine cabozantinib concentration in plasma using HPLC-UV. Sorafenib, an internal standard, was added to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maruyama et al [11] developed the first quantitative method for cabozantinib detection using HPLC-UV, reporting a quantitative concentration range of 0.02-4 µg/mL, which is lower than our quantitative concentration range. However, a therapeutic window between 0.5 and 1.5 µg/mL has been proposed for cabozantinib trough levels to ensure an acceptable balance between effectiveness and toxicity [14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Maruyama et al [11] developed the first quantitative method for cabozantinib detection using HPLC-UV, reporting a quantitative concentration range of 0.02-4 µg/mL, which is lower than our quantitative concentration range. However, a therapeutic window between 0.5 and 1.5 µg/mL has been proposed for cabozantinib trough levels to ensure an acceptable balance between effectiveness and toxicity [14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The intraday and interday CV were 3.26% and 2.52%, respectively, with this method, compared to 5.2% and 6.8%, respectively, with the previous method. In addition, the intraday and interday accuracies were −4.35% to 0.79% and −1.05% to 0.98% [11], respectively, with this method, compared with 0.6% to 10.1% and 0.3% to 9.7%, respectively, with the previous method. Third, the initial investment is low and the procedure is simple because few instruments are used for sample preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations