1973
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(73)90390-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative determination of surface carboxyl groups in vinyl acid modified styrene/butadiene copolymer latexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of acid groups was completely differ- Figure 6 Amount of surface acid groups as a function of the total surface area of the swollen latex particles per unit volume of the aqueous phase at X ov ϭ 0 in the seeded-batch-emulsion polymerization of styrene and acrylic acid at pH 2.5 for all the initiator concentrations and temperature listed in Table III. ent at pH 2.5 and 7 and was qualitatively in good agreement with the work of several authors. 25,33,34 All these authors reported that a high pH retains the dissociated carboxylic groups in the water phase, whereas a lower pH increases the AA concentration in the organic phase. This can explain the difference in the amount of buried acid groups (assuming that the amount of buried groups is related to the partition coefficient) at different pH values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The distribution of acid groups was completely differ- Figure 6 Amount of surface acid groups as a function of the total surface area of the swollen latex particles per unit volume of the aqueous phase at X ov ϭ 0 in the seeded-batch-emulsion polymerization of styrene and acrylic acid at pH 2.5 for all the initiator concentrations and temperature listed in Table III. ent at pH 2.5 and 7 and was qualitatively in good agreement with the work of several authors. 25,33,34 All these authors reported that a high pH retains the dissociated carboxylic groups in the water phase, whereas a lower pH increases the AA concentration in the organic phase. This can explain the difference in the amount of buried acid groups (assuming that the amount of buried groups is related to the partition coefficient) at different pH values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…a combination of turbidimetric titration and neutron activation analysis [1] or, more common used, conductometric and potentiometric titration combined with ion exchange and dialysis [2], rather easily give the distribution of the acid in the water and the polymer phase. The separation of the carboxylic groups in the polymer phase into surface and "buried" groups, on the contrary, seems to be more difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] The total amount of carboxyl could be achieved by neutronactivation method while the amount on the surface of the particle could not be determined. [6] Both potentiometric titration and surfactant titration methods have a problem that it is difficult to find the endpoint of the titration. [7,9] The conductometric titration method has become the most popular method to determine the amount of carboxyl groups on the particle surface owing to its advantages such as simple operation, clear endpoint of titration and high sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very important to quantitate the amount of surface carboxyl groups, because it has great impact on some key properties of the particles such as colloid stability, viscosity and bio-coupling efficiency. [1 -5] The traditional quantitative methods include neutron-activation [6] , potentiometric titration [7] , surfactant titration [8] , and conductometric titration methods. [9] The total amount of carboxyl could be achieved by neutronactivation method while the amount on the surface of the particle could not be determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%