2011
DOI: 10.2174/1874256401105010042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Determination of Trypsin Inhibitory Activity in Complex Matrices

Abstract: A quantitative assay using azocasein was developed to measure trypsin inhibitory activity in emulsions and other complex systems that are refractory to analysis. The method was tested for reproducibility on pure protein solutions as well as protein-containing material rich in fats and sugars, with special attention to emulsions. In the clean situation, the overall relative standard deviation was less than 6% while for the more complex systems it was less than 16%. The procedure proved robust against deliberate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method we adopted here does not require ampholytes, so it is a cheaper and more convenient method. In the present study, a comparison on the trypsin inhibitor activity was carried out using different natural and synthetic substrates where, the TIA results were in conformity to Spelbrink et al [16]. Earlier reports also suggest the use of both natural and synthetic substrates in determination of antitryptic activity as natural substrates are more difficult to displace from the active site to form the enzyme inhibitor complex while synthetic substrate are accurate in determining the inhibitor content of the materials [17] thereby providing a value with physiological relevance [16].…”
Section: Trypsin Inhibitor Activity Assaysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The method we adopted here does not require ampholytes, so it is a cheaper and more convenient method. In the present study, a comparison on the trypsin inhibitor activity was carried out using different natural and synthetic substrates where, the TIA results were in conformity to Spelbrink et al [16]. Earlier reports also suggest the use of both natural and synthetic substrates in determination of antitryptic activity as natural substrates are more difficult to displace from the active site to form the enzyme inhibitor complex while synthetic substrate are accurate in determining the inhibitor content of the materials [17] thereby providing a value with physiological relevance [16].…”
Section: Trypsin Inhibitor Activity Assaysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The activity of an inhibitor of an enzyme is quantified by its inhibitory activity (IA). IA, expressed as the amount of trypsin inactivated by a certain quantity of sample, was calculated according to Equation (1) [ 38 ]. The amount of potato protein in the well of the microtiter plate of the dilutions from each sample was plotted against the absorption at 450 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of potato protein in the well of the microtiter plate of the dilutions from each sample was plotted against the absorption at 450 nm. A premise for the calculation of IA from the slope of the resulting line is that the decrease in absorbance is linear with the amount of trypsin ( Figure 2 A) [ 38 ]. This method was confirmed by a positive control, without potato protein ( Figure 2 B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations