2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative dispersion evaluation of carbon nanotubes using a new analysis protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many prior works regarding the quantification of mixture quality primarily focused on the non-uniformity of distribution, regardless of the sizes or structures of the dispersed phase. Typically for a dispersion of spherical * nakayama@chem-eng.kyushu-u.ac.jp particles, the center points of the particles are first identified, then the distribution of the center points is analyzed [15][16][17]. One direct approach to measure the distribution inhomogeneity is to evaluate the deviation from the uniform distribution based on fluctuation of the point density [15,16,[18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many prior works regarding the quantification of mixture quality primarily focused on the non-uniformity of distribution, regardless of the sizes or structures of the dispersed phase. Typically for a dispersion of spherical * nakayama@chem-eng.kyushu-u.ac.jp particles, the center points of the particles are first identified, then the distribution of the center points is analyzed [15][16][17]. One direct approach to measure the distribution inhomogeneity is to evaluate the deviation from the uniform distribution based on fluctuation of the point density [15,16,[18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One direct approach to measure the distribution inhomogeneity is to evaluate the deviation from the uniform distribution based on fluctuation of the point density [15,16,[18][19][20][21][22]. Another approach is to evaluate a certain cost function of the inter-point distance, which is the minimum when the points are uniformly distributed [17]. These techniques are useful for systems where the ideal distribution is homogeneous but not for systems with internal structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques from image analysis have been employed in a number of previous studies [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26], and these approaches partially address the limitations of interpretation from physical properties. However, as has been pointed out by previous authors [24, 27], the bottleneck of these methods lies in the correct identification of CNTs from the obtained images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it can be expected that there is a good interface bonding force between the treated fiber surface and cement matrix because of larger surface area and surface grooves, both of which can lead to strong gripping forces between the matrix and the reinforcement [2] [16]. In addition, chemical groups such as hydroxyl and carbonyl might be removed at high temperature, which is conducive to the combination of fiber and cement [2] [4] [7]. Thus, in the subsequent study, CFRC of fine properties can be prepared.…”
Section: Surface Modification Of Carbon Fibers By Cvd Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the added fiber depends on the degree of fiber dispersion. Numerous previous works were focused on the improvement of fiber dispersion [7] [8] [9]. Electrical resistivity measurement has been used to assess the degree of steel fiber dispersion [1] [10] [11], but little has been reported on the comparison of different methods, especially dispersion of carbon fibers after Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%