2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative drinking water arsenic concentrations in field environments using mobile phone photometry of field kits

Abstract: Arsenic (As) groundwater contamination is common yet spatially heterogeneous within most environments. It is therefore necessary to measure As concentrations to determine whether a water source is safe to drink. Measurement of As in the field involves using a test strip that changes color in the presence of As. These tests are relatively inexpensive, but results are subjective and provide binned categorical data rather than exact determinations of As concentration. The goal of this work was to determine if pho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a fast semi-quantitative result. Individual differences in color recognition can be avoided using smartphone apps measuring the R, G and B value of the colored test solutions (Peng et al 2019) or of commercially available field test kits for selected soil contaminants like As (Haque et al 2016). Furthermore, there is no problem with the disposal of the chemicals, since everything is kept in the closed tubes.…”
Section: Field Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a fast semi-quantitative result. Individual differences in color recognition can be avoided using smartphone apps measuring the R, G and B value of the colored test solutions (Peng et al 2019) or of commercially available field test kits for selected soil contaminants like As (Haque et al 2016). Furthermore, there is no problem with the disposal of the chemicals, since everything is kept in the closed tubes.…”
Section: Field Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10–14 However, commercially available colorimetric field kits with poor sensitivity struggle to meet the drinking water standard limits (10 μg L −1 ) and are also proven not completely reliable for As measurements. 15,16 Electrochemical methods offer the advantage of having good sensitivity and small-size but they are susceptible to matrix interference and field analysis with electrochemical analyzers is rarely robust for real samples. 11 Atomic spectrometry techniques ( e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] However, commercially available colorimetric eld kits with poor sensitivity struggle to meet the drinking water standard limits (10 mg L −1 ) and are also proven not completely reliable for As measurements. 15,16 Electrochemical methods offer the advantage of having good sensitivity and small-size but they are susceptible to matrix interference and eld analysis with electrochemical analyzers is rarely robust for real samples. 11 Atomic spectrometry techniques (e.g., atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), atomic uorescence spectrometry (AFS), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry/mass spectrometry (ICP-OES/ MS)) are commonly used for the determination of elements (including As) with high sensitivity and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test strips have been examined for the quantification of chemical substances in various samples. The precise quantitative use of test strips has been demonstrated 9 . Improving their accuracy should further broaden the quantitative application of test strips 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%