2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3592423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Easing and the Price-Liquidity Trade-Off

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper contributes to the literature by being the first to study how QE affects the underlying network structure of investors. Second, the increased market concentration as a result of QE provides support for other studies on the existence of preferred habitat investors in the euro area (Ferdinandusse et al, 2017;Boermans and Vermeulen, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper contributes to the literature by being the first to study how QE affects the underlying network structure of investors. Second, the increased market concentration as a result of QE provides support for other studies on the existence of preferred habitat investors in the euro area (Ferdinandusse et al, 2017;Boermans and Vermeulen, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…They show that mainly foreign investors sold bonds to the Eurosystem, whereas insurers and pension funds bought these bonds despite the QE program. Ferdinandusse et al (2017) further suggest that insurers and pension funds are preferred habitat investors in the euro area. Using granular portfolio holdings data they construct a measure of market tightness defined as the share of preferred habitat investors, which is closely related to market concentration.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Search frictions: Absent new issuance, asset purchases lead to a reduction in the quantity of bonds held by private investors. If there are search frictions, then this could reduce trading by making it more difficult for investors to be matched (Ferdinandusse et al, 2017). And if it becomes more difficult for dealers to source specific bonds in the secondary market, then the costs and risks of market-making could increase, reducing dealers' willingness to intermediate trades (Kandrac, 2018).…”
Section: How Might the Cbps Have Impacted Liquidity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, asset purchases by a relatively price-insensitive central bank might distort price signals, reducing the willingness of market participants to trade. In theory, the net effect of these channels could be positive or negative (Ferdinandusse et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%