2014
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnp.0000436895.25373.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Electromyography of the Frontalis Muscle

Abstract: Multi-MUP analysis seems to be helpful in differentiating the patients with neurogenic and-to a lesser extent-myogenic facial muscle involvement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible factor is the different architecture and muscle fiber‐type composition of facial muscles compared with limb muscles, which may have an influence on reinnervation processes . MUNIX was “calibrated” for limb muscles (abductor digiti minimi), but very proximal muscles and facial muscles have shorter duration and smaller amplitude MUPs on EMG compared with more distal muscles . However, in a simulation model of MUNIX, simulating lower single MUP amplitudes had no significant influence on MUSIX, but significantly reduced MUNIX values .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible factor is the different architecture and muscle fiber‐type composition of facial muscles compared with limb muscles, which may have an influence on reinnervation processes . MUNIX was “calibrated” for limb muscles (abductor digiti minimi), but very proximal muscles and facial muscles have shorter duration and smaller amplitude MUPs on EMG compared with more distal muscles . However, in a simulation model of MUNIX, simulating lower single MUP amplitudes had no significant influence on MUSIX, but significantly reduced MUNIX values .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a comparative study, this duration algorithm outperformed the results of conventional methods over normal and pathological signals. However, recent works are still using conventional methods to measure MUAP duration (Ghosh et al, 2014;Matur et al, 2014), sometimes applying manual corrections (Jian et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%