1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01244553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative EPMA and TEM of unsupported films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that the X-ray energies of the characteristic lines are positioned in the region lower than 0.7 keV of the energy spectrum, which allows the effective emission of the generated X-rays to take place only in very shallow depth [105,106]. Another difficulty occurs if the emission energy of the analyzed element coincides with the absorption edge of an accompanying element [107][108][109], which makes it necessary to reduce surface contamination caused by long analysis times [105,109]. The surface roughness of technological samples complicates the evaluation of the results, since changes of the take-off angle of 5°can alter the results by 10 % when performing the analysis at the relatively shallow take-off angle of 32° [106,108].…”
Section: Electron Probe Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that the X-ray energies of the characteristic lines are positioned in the region lower than 0.7 keV of the energy spectrum, which allows the effective emission of the generated X-rays to take place only in very shallow depth [105,106]. Another difficulty occurs if the emission energy of the analyzed element coincides with the absorption edge of an accompanying element [107][108][109], which makes it necessary to reduce surface contamination caused by long analysis times [105,109]. The surface roughness of technological samples complicates the evaluation of the results, since changes of the take-off angle of 5°can alter the results by 10 % when performing the analysis at the relatively shallow take-off angle of 32° [106,108].…”
Section: Electron Probe Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is furthermore possible to extend this method to the analysis of unsupported layers [7]. The attainable depth resolution has been demonstrated to be, under favorable circumstances, comparable to that of Auger sputter profiling [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure thickness using EDS, we need a reference for the x-ray signal. Dijkstra et al [1] used a bulk target as a reference in TEM but the yield was too high at currents suitable for analysis of a thin sample. Boon [2] devised a beam current monitor linear over 3-4 decades so that a bulk target could be measured at much less current than the specimen and a beam current correction applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions like tilting the holder as shown in Fig.2 and removing material on the side of the holder facing the detector as in Fig.3 can help alleviate the occlusion [5,6]. Any occlusion alters  in equation (1) and thus influences any method of mass thickness measurement but the reference sample can be used to test what area on the sample is safe to use for measurement. With a 5 degree specimen tilt we have been able to obtain consistent mass thickness measurements in a JEOL JEC 2100 TEM over a region spanning 0.8mm (Fig.4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%