2009
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative estimates of visual performance features in fossil birds

Abstract: Eyeball structures such as the lens diameter (LD) and axial length are generally assumed to be highly correlated with optically meaningful parameters. However, these optical constraints on eyeball macroanatomy have never been tested explicitly. Tradeoffs between benefits of improved visual performance and cost of adaptation from an increase of tissue production predict that when eyeball size increases, optical parameters such as posterior nodal distance and maximum entrance pupil diameter should increase isome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger sockets strongly correlate with larger eyes as shown by data on fish (SI Appendix, Estimating Eye and Pupil Size in Early Tetrapods and Fig. S4), reptiles (15), birds (16), and primates (17). Evidence spanning such a broad bracket of vertebrates shows that eye socket size in our group of ancient animals reliably captures what their eye size would have been.…”
Section: Computational Visual Ecologysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Larger sockets strongly correlate with larger eyes as shown by data on fish (SI Appendix, Estimating Eye and Pupil Size in Early Tetrapods and Fig. S4), reptiles (15), birds (16), and primates (17). Evidence spanning such a broad bracket of vertebrates shows that eye socket size in our group of ancient animals reliably captures what their eye size would have been.…”
Section: Computational Visual Ecologysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Hall et al state there was no osteological proxy for axial length, yet the external scleral-ring diameter is correlated with axial length (9). All osteological features in our analysis are optically relevant, facilitating functional interpretations of morphospace.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…4). Previous work has shown that corneal diameter (Ritland, 1982;Hall and Ross, 2007), lens diameter (Schmitz, 2009), and the inner diameter of the sclerotic ring discriminate between nocturnal and diurnal birds (Hall, 2008b;Schmitz, 2008Schmitz, , 2009) and lizards (Hall, 2008a(Hall, , 2009. Nocturnal birds probably possess a larger inner diameter of the sclerotic ring and corneal diameter to allow more light to enter the eye (e.g., Martin, 1990).…”
Section: Type 1 Optic Foramen: Activity Pattern Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head length was measured to investigate the allometry of the optic foramen across birds, and was measured from the centerpoint of the junction of the keratinous sheath of the beak proper and the bony skull to the posterior-most point on the skull. Previous work has shown that both orbit diameter (Kay and Kirk, 2000;Ross, 2001, 2004;Kirk and Kay, 2004;Kirk, 2006a;Hall, 2008b) and the inner diameter of the sclerotic ring (Hall, 2008b;Schmitz, 2009) differ between nocturnal and diurnal species. Orbit diameter is a bony correlate of the transverse diameter of the eye, a useful indicator of overall eye size, and nocturnal birds exhibit a larger eye (Ritland, 1982;Hall and Ross, 2007) and orbit diameter than diurnal birds (Hall, 2008b).…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%