2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-55265/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of dental bio-aerosols using particle count values. Part 1: the effect of High Volume Aspiration and natural ventilation.

Abstract: AimRoutine dental treatments are frequently associated with aerosol generating procedures (AGP). Recently dental AGP have attracted significant attention as a possible vector for the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and attempts have been made to establish when a surgery may be safely decontaminated following a dental AGP — the ‘fallow time’. There is a paucity of research in the dental literature regarding the near real time generation and dispersion of dental aerosol following a dental AGP. Study aims are to: (1) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another pressing reason to model this open window scenario is the paucity of studies undertaken on this, despite the volume of guidance which recommends it. One study recently undertaken by Haigh, Vasant and O'Hooley [31] attempted to display the effects of an open window on particle removal in another mannequin study; however, they were unable to definitively quantify the effect this had, although they did conclude that it reduced airborne particle volume. Their study also did not include particles below 0.3 micrometres, which is a disadvantage given that this is the size of particle into which viruses fall.…”
Section: Sci Forschenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another pressing reason to model this open window scenario is the paucity of studies undertaken on this, despite the volume of guidance which recommends it. One study recently undertaken by Haigh, Vasant and O'Hooley [31] attempted to display the effects of an open window on particle removal in another mannequin study; however, they were unable to definitively quantify the effect this had, although they did conclude that it reduced airborne particle volume. Their study also did not include particles below 0.3 micrometres, which is a disadvantage given that this is the size of particle into which viruses fall.…”
Section: Sci Forschenmentioning
confidence: 99%