2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-014-3953-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of mining geo-environmental quality in Northeast China: comprehensive index method and support vector machine models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive evaluation is key for comparative and decision-making analyses. There are many statistics-based methods, such as comprehensive index method [39], analytic hierarchy process [40], fuzzy mathematics method [41,42], multiple criteria decision making approaches [43,44], support vector machine [39,45], random forest [46], artificial neural networks [47], and Topsis method [42]. These methods are of great importance to qualitatively or quantitatively evaluate forest fire, forest sustainability, ecosystem management alternatives, and more.…”
Section: Compared With Statistics-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A comprehensive evaluation is key for comparative and decision-making analyses. There are many statistics-based methods, such as comprehensive index method [39], analytic hierarchy process [40], fuzzy mathematics method [41,42], multiple criteria decision making approaches [43,44], support vector machine [39,45], random forest [46], artificial neural networks [47], and Topsis method [42]. These methods are of great importance to qualitatively or quantitatively evaluate forest fire, forest sustainability, ecosystem management alternatives, and more.…”
Section: Compared With Statistics-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are of great importance to qualitatively or quantitatively evaluate forest fire, forest sustainability, ecosystem management alternatives, and more. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. However, some problems remain, such as the selection of the evaluation factors not being sufficiently comprehensive and objective, and unreasonable comprehensive evaluation methods with subjective factors and complex weight calculations lead to the evaluation results lacking comparability [39].…”
Section: Compared With Statistics-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a class of kernel-based learning methods [33]. Now, the LSSVM has been widely used in forecasting [34][35][36], data fitting [37,38], comprehensive evaluation [39,40] and pattern recognition [41][42][43]. The steps are as follows.…”
Section: The Topsis Improved By the Grey Incidence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in 2011, Pilz, Marco and so on, taking Santiago, Chile as an example, studied the evaluation of urban seismic conditions and proposed the key factors for the evaluation of geological disasters [1]. In 2015, Jiang X et al proposed a common comprehensive index method and a new support vector machine (SVM) model, and compared them to evaluate the geological environment quality of mining [2]. Kong C et al presented an integrated technique using back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and geographic information system (GIS) to assess suitability for agricultural land based on geo-environmental factors in the rural-urban fringe [3]; Chen X et al used the weights-of-evidence method based on ArcGIS to evaluate the sensitivity of debris flow in Kangding County [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%