2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evaluation of multiple adulterants in roasted coffee by Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and chemometrics

Abstract: The current study presents an application of Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy for detection and quantification of fraudulent addition of commonly employed adulterants (spent coffee grounds, coffee husks, roasted corn and roasted barley) to roasted and ground coffee. Roasted coffee samples were intentionally blended with the adulterants (pure and mixed), with total adulteration levels ranging from 1% to 66% w/w. Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS) was used to relate the processed s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained RMSEC and RMSEP values were 1.44 and 2.42, respectively, and the correlation coefficient values of calibration ( ) and validation ( V ) were 0.99 for both parameters ( Table 2). It is noteworthy to mention that such model is more robust in comparison to the one obtained in our previous study [10] employing DRIFTS (LV = 10, RMSEC = 2.01, = 0.99, RMSEP = 3.70, and V = 0.96).…”
Section: Journal Of Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained RMSEC and RMSEP values were 1.44 and 2.42, respectively, and the correlation coefficient values of calibration ( ) and validation ( V ) were 0.99 for both parameters ( Table 2). It is noteworthy to mention that such model is more robust in comparison to the one obtained in our previous study [10] employing DRIFTS (LV = 10, RMSEC = 2.01, = 0.99, RMSEP = 3.70, and V = 0.96).…”
Section: Journal Of Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 47%
“…In order to develop analytical tools suitable to detect and identify adulteration in roasted and ground coffee, different techniques and procedures have been proposed, including UPLC [2], GC-MS [3], Direct Infusion Electrospray Ionization [5], HPAEC-PA [6], HPLC-DAD [7], UV-Vis, and Infrared Spectroscopy [4,[8][9][10][11]. Among these techniques, spectroscopic methods have gained attention in recent studies because they are fast, reliable, and simple to perform and usually do not require sample pretreatment, being thus appropriate for establishment of routine laboratory analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FT‐IR and Raman spectroscopic methods have been utilized to determine authenticity, microbes, and chemical compositions in cocoa and coffee powders. FT‐MIR spectroscopy has been employed to measure the fraudulent addition of multiple adulterants, including barley, corn, spent coffee grounds, and coffee husks in coffee powder (1% to 66% w/w), and to grade coffee powders into different quality levels (Briandet and others ; Wang and others ; Reis and others ). Very high accuracies were obtained by employing proper multivariate regressions (such as PLSR, PCR) and preprocessing methods (such as 1st Der, 2nd Der, SNV, and MSC) to build and enhance calibration models.…”
Section: Quality Evaluation Of Powdery Foodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) has been used for different quantitative determinations in food products (Pappas et al, 2011;Reis et al, 2013). One of the major advantages of spectroscopy is to collect information from a large sample area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%