2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21753-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Idea Generation in the Wild

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faced with the often fuzzy front-end of design where questions like what to do, how to do it, where to begin, and what do the users need, ultimately, to be successful, are better addressed by making users part of the process, from the very beginning. Many types of idea generation models have been introduced to support that critical part of the process, with mixed evidence regarding their effectiveness (Liikkanen, Hämäläinen, Haggman, Bjorklund, & Koskinen, 2011). The wood-block approach follows and extends the traditional path of user-centered design process models, which typically observe user activities, document those observations, and then create a design based on that documentation (Oulasvirta et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faced with the often fuzzy front-end of design where questions like what to do, how to do it, where to begin, and what do the users need, ultimately, to be successful, are better addressed by making users part of the process, from the very beginning. Many types of idea generation models have been introduced to support that critical part of the process, with mixed evidence regarding their effectiveness (Liikkanen, Hämäläinen, Haggman, Bjorklund, & Koskinen, 2011). The wood-block approach follows and extends the traditional path of user-centered design process models, which typically observe user activities, document those observations, and then create a design based on that documentation (Oulasvirta et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation scales were novelty, utility, and feasibility of an idea. The scales were decided by referring a previous study [10]. Each of ideas was evaluated by five-point rate (0: lowest and 4: highest).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For assessing ideation quality, researchers usually are guided by the following four steps: First, unique ideas from an ideation session are identified; second, a quality score is assigned to each individual idea (usually done by domain experts, who understand and interpret the ideas [21]); third, by using one of the four approaches discussed below, a metric value is computed, which is used, forth, to make statistical comparisons between treatments of every session threshold [25].…”
Section: Outcome-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a huge variety of criteria to give a score to each individual idea: The creativity of an idea is usually assessed through novelty -how unusual or unexpected an idea is compared to the other ideas [29] -and quality (feasibility or the readiness for implementation and the detail of description [8,9]) [21]. Other criteria are utility [21], effectiveness [32], the value ideas could create [3], the importance of an idea within a specific context [33], and the magnitude of impact an idea might have [7].…”
Section: Outcome-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation