2013
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2012.2199489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Evaluation of Transform Domains for Compressive Sampling-Based Recovery of Sparsely Sampled Volumetric OCT Images

Abstract: Recently, compressive sampling has received significant attention as an emerging technique for rapid volumetric imaging. We have previously investigated volumetric optical coherence tomography (OCT) image acquisition using compressive sampling techniques and showed that it was possible to recover image volumes from a subset of sampled images. Our previous findings used the multidimensional wavelet transform as the domain of sparsification for recovering OCT image volumes. In this report, we analyzed and compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been demonstrated with both B-mode and 3-D imaging in real-time systems [28]. One study evaluated the performance of different transform domains for recovery of OCT volumes from sparse data sets [30]. The Fourier basis, wavelet basis, Dirac basis, discrete-cosine basis (DCT), and surfacelet basis are examples of common bases examined.…”
Section: Speckle Reduction and Signal Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been demonstrated with both B-mode and 3-D imaging in real-time systems [28]. One study evaluated the performance of different transform domains for recovery of OCT volumes from sparse data sets [30]. The Fourier basis, wavelet basis, Dirac basis, discrete-cosine basis (DCT), and surfacelet basis are examples of common bases examined.…”
Section: Speckle Reduction and Signal Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basis functions can be chosen from a set of training images similar to the input image [31] and thus can be more adaptive for the representation of specific features. Several recent works have also applied the sparse representation to OCT image reconstruction problems [4, 6,12, 1416, 24, 3234]. While different retinal layers have varied pathologic structures [3537] and even speckle patterns, most of the sparse reconstruction methods only train one general dictionary to represent complex structures and textures in the ocular OCT images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%