2015
DOI: 10.1038/nature14279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative evolutionary dynamics using high-resolution lineage tracking

Abstract: Summary Evolution of large asexual cell populations underlies ~30% of deaths worldwide, including those caused by bacteria, fungi, parasites, and cancer. However, the dynamics underlying these evolutionary processes remain poorly understood because they involve many competing beneficial lineages, most of which never rise above extremely low frequencies in the population. To observe these normally hidden evolutionary dynamics, we constructed a sequencing-based ultra high-resolution lineage tracking system in Sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
775
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(797 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
21
775
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, a phenomenon called clonal interference occurs in evolving asexual populations because beneficial mutations that arise in different lineages in the same population cannot be brought together by recombination. As a consequence, lineages with highly beneficial mutations outcompete other lineages with less beneficial mutations, such that only the most beneficial mutations available typically can achieve fixation on the timescale of this experiment (39)(40)(41). For example, even though mutations in nadR may be beneficial under all of the temperature regimes, they are able to reach high frequency in competition against other mutations only in the 32°C environment, whereas mutations in other genes will dominate the initial waves of adaptation at other temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a phenomenon called clonal interference occurs in evolving asexual populations because beneficial mutations that arise in different lineages in the same population cannot be brought together by recombination. As a consequence, lineages with highly beneficial mutations outcompete other lineages with less beneficial mutations, such that only the most beneficial mutations available typically can achieve fixation on the timescale of this experiment (39)(40)(41). For example, even though mutations in nadR may be beneficial under all of the temperature regimes, they are able to reach high frequency in competition against other mutations only in the 32°C environment, whereas mutations in other genes will dominate the initial waves of adaptation at other temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one then regresses t 0 on the speed v of adaptation, one could infer the fitness variance D per generation that is generated by mutations. Genetic barcoding techniques allow tracking of many subpopulations (Levy et al 2015). This will make it possible to study, in a similar way, the higher-order cross-correlation functions in Equation 13, which are generalizations of the heterozygosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also effectively apply in island models with low migration rates, where the fitness effect of a mutation is reduced by potentially low migration rates. But, in well-mixed populations, the diffusion approach breaks down when the probability per generation to acquire a beneficial mutation is much smaller than their typical effect (Rouzine et al 2003), which has been confirmed for a number of microbial species when they adapt to new environments (Perfeito et al 2007;Gordo et al 2011;Levy et al 2015).The stochastic term ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ebc t p h t in Equation 1 accounts for all random factors that influence the reproduction process. The function h t ðxÞ represents standard white noise, i.e., a set of d-correlated random numbers,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one possible explanation for the high level of HSF1-independent chaperone expression in mammalian cells is to create a chaperone buffer that dampens variability between cells in a tissue caused by random protein misfolding. To test this notion, one experimental approach is to engineer a chaperone buffer in yeast by expressing synHDGs to varying degrees above their endogenous levels and measure the fitness distribution across a clonal population using a recently developed high-throughput technique based on deepsequencing of genetically encoded cell barcodes (Levy et al, 2015). If random fluctuations in the protein-folding environment between cells are a major driver of fitness variation, then variability should decrease as the chaperone buffer increases.…”
Section: Chapter 4: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%